I was hired directly out of NARS to a class I on graduation, and that was during the big slow down. Since you didn't go to NARS how do you know what's best? Again, there is not "right" answer.
And again, here we are with guys who didn't go giving opinions on what was best despite the fact that you did go. While you were working at a short line, I was working at BNSF and my seniority date is higher than any new hires that might come in from Short Lines.
There is not a correct answer, just different approaches. But the statement that "its a waste of money" is NOT a fact, it's just an opinion and not based on some absolute knowledge someone has.
Everyone in our new hire class with BNSF was NARS, no off the street, so don't kid yourself
Well I certainly understand and respect your point of view. I agree when you say there is no right answer. However, economically speaking, I would rather get paid to be trained than pay for it (personal preference), plus you start your railroad retirement sooner . Also, the one year spent on the short lines was actually less time than I would have spent at NARS (not sure if the program is still a 2 year degree or not like it was when I thought about going.) Therefore, I actually had better seniority because I was hired by BNSF sooner. Also I lucked out and got put into engine service 3 weeks after conductor school. Had I went to NARS I would have had to wait an additional 2-3 years for promotion. Stars were lined up for me on that one.....
The long and the short of it is that if you want to work for a railroad then you do what you need to do to make yourself standout above the other canidates/applicants whether it be real working experience or through a school.
And again, here we are with guys who didn't go giving opinions on what was best despite the fact that you did go. While you were working at a short line, I was working at BNSF and my seniority date is higher than any new hires that might come in from Short Lines.
There is not a correct answer, just different approaches. But the statement that "its a waste of money" is NOT a fact, it's just an opinion and not based on some absolute knowledge someone has.
Everyone in our new hire class with BNSF was NARS, no off the street, so don't kid yourself
Well I certainly understand and respect your point of view. I agree when you say there is no right answer. However, economically speaking, I would rather get paid to be trained than pay for it (personal preference), plus you start your railroad retirement sooner . Also, the one year spent on the short lines was actually less time than I would have spent at NARS (not sure if the program is still a 2 year degree or not like it was when I thought about going.) Therefore, I actually had better seniority because I was hired by BNSF sooner. Also I lucked out and got put into engine service 3 weeks after conductor school. Had I went to NARS I would have had to wait an additional 2-3 years for promotion. Stars were lined up for me on that one.....
The long and the short of it is that if you want to work for a railroad then you do what you need to do to make yourself standout above the other canidates/applicants whether it be real working experience or through a school.