lvrr325 wrote:I'm not even going to dignify this one by quoting stuff from just a few posts up the page plus info from the link I posted, just read the page again, it's getting tiring when people can't even follow the discussion through six or eight posts.You might want to have the Doc lighten up the dosage on those Sour pills, they're working a little too well! No hard feelings, I'll still let you buy me a rum and coke after the RIT show!
While the engine may have sat a while "for air trouble", that does not necessarily mean there are major problems with it. Shipping dead engines SHOULD be simple but it's amazing how often someone forgets how to deal with configuring the controls. Also, if the engine has the MR lines MU'd to the train's power, the MR's are filled that way. But if it's shipped as a boxcar, it can take a very long time to charge. Many ( all?) locos have a choke which limits the rate of charging of the main reservoir when done through the brake pipe. It's very common for a crew to tie onto a train consist with a dead unit, wait a short time, then do an air test. "Hey - the brakes won't set up on the engine! Must be something wrong, set it out." The only thing "wrong" is they didn't wait long enough to charge the dead loco enough for the brakes to work.
I'm not saying that is or is not the problem in this case. But having dealt with just that scenario many times in the past, it's the first possibility that comes to mind.
And while you were commenting about the delay at Cumberland to "fix stuff", I thought you were commenting on the discussion about the unit going through to Selkirk rather than being set off at Dewitt.