by Tadman
afiggatt wrote:The Amtrak Inspector General's office criticized Amtrak for ordering 70 ACS-64s as that was more than the current number of trains need. Amtrak had, IIRC, 64 (nominally) working AEM-7s and HHP-8s when the ACS-64 order was placed. So 70 units is an increase in fleet size. But Amtrak is looking at the long view for the ACS-64 order to have a reserve for growth in Regional and Keystone service. Once the production line shuts down, ordering 5 units to fill a gap 10 years from now would be expensive.That's a bit frustrating. As Afiggatt mentions, it is really hard to buy a handful of such equipment once the production line is down. What happens is you often get an oddball or a problem locomotive. Witness CP's purchase of SD40F's after the SD40 line had been down for a few years. It was a total disaster. The Amtrak purchase of HHP's was not exactly a good deal, either - they needed a handful of conventional locomotives and shoe-horned the Acela technology into a conventional package. Big surprise, it didn't work well either.
The only other choice is to give up on adding new trains except every 20 years when new power is ordered. That doesn't make much sense.
The new Acela: It's not Aveliable.