Hi, My name is Joe and having grown up in the South Chicago-Northwest Indiana area when the trains were all here in the 60's and
70's I was afflicted by the bug early and in a big dose. I lived in R.I. and went to school there from 1980 to 88' (URI-Lived 100
yards from Kingston Station!) and became fascinated by the character and color of New England Railroads. In a small geographical
area it has something for everyone, from Crawford Notch to the New Haven electric zone. The sad part is the very quality that
brings endearment to the New England Lines also killed them. Short hauls, high taxes & terminal costs, massive passenger
responsibilities and a rapidly eroding freight base, running into the arms of truckers, knocked it dead. Like a fish out of water,
by the 60's, the whole regions railroad service was laying on it side gasping for every breath of air when only a return to water
solves the problem!
50's; The future problems are looming on the horizon and are recognized; but the damage hasn't been done yet ...........AND
AMAZINGLY............The Federal, State and Local Govt. are on the railroads side!!!.........Although the Interstate will be
built it is clear that without healthy railroads the Interstate will rapidly become a noisy, polluting parking lot. All levels
of government recognize that:
Street:
Aroostock, Grand Trunk plus Canadian lines in New England, Maine Central, Central of Vermont, St. Johnsbury & Lamoille County,
Rutland, Boston & Maine, New Haven (Poughkeepsee bridge intact) and Delaware & Hudson. The New York Central will contribute
the Boston & Albany but not Selkirk yard as well as trackage rights on the West Shore line with purchase option. To provide long
distance haulage to the area and decrease the terminal nature of the region also included are:Lehigh & Hudson
River, and Erie (not merged yet). The Lehigh Valley,
Lackawanna, Central of New Jersey and Susquehanna are being considered for inclusion into a possible "Penn Central" like
combination but nothing is cast in stone
yet.
Think about what railroads would be like if common sense had prevailed? We might still have some of the quaintness. With todays
preservation consciousness think of what might still be around or even still in use? Imagine "Ski Trains" ,working and patronized
long distance trains and efficent, frequent freight service to all customers not just the unit train purchaser. So when your bored
at work, sitting in commuter traffic, milking the cows, or mowing the lawn (er...I mean....shoveling snow), Build your fantasy
railroad, rebuild New England to your liking, imagine it running, and working! But by all means, share it here! I'd love to know
what yours would look like, and operate like!!!
70's I was afflicted by the bug early and in a big dose. I lived in R.I. and went to school there from 1980 to 88' (URI-Lived 100
yards from Kingston Station!) and became fascinated by the character and color of New England Railroads. In a small geographical
area it has something for everyone, from Crawford Notch to the New Haven electric zone. The sad part is the very quality that
brings endearment to the New England Lines also killed them. Short hauls, high taxes & terminal costs, massive passenger
responsibilities and a rapidly eroding freight base, running into the arms of truckers, knocked it dead. Like a fish out of water,
by the 60's, the whole regions railroad service was laying on it side gasping for every breath of air when only a return to water
solves the problem!
- ............................WHAT IF?......................
50's; The future problems are looming on the horizon and are recognized; but the damage hasn't been done yet ...........AND
AMAZINGLY............The Federal, State and Local Govt. are on the railroads side!!!.........Although the Interstate will be
built it is clear that without healthy railroads the Interstate will rapidly become a noisy, polluting parking lot. All levels
of government recognize that:
- 1.)Taxes on real estate directly involved in right of way should more
accurately reflect a level playing field with truckers and airlines. Tax abatements are granted.
- 2.)Commuter and Passenger services are a necessity but should no longer be a direct burden on railroad
finances. The decision has been made to provide 100% subsidy for these services. The only decision left open is should service be
structured Metra/NJ Transit style or paid through direct subsidy to the railroads to be operated at no loss to them.
- 3.) The ICC has come to its senses and has recognized the need for an "updating" in its outlook on
railroad regulation. It has agreed that:
- A.)A regional railroad merger plan similiar to the
proposals considered in the 1920's that would bring together regional railroads to provide more efficent service recognizing that
competition really exists between"different modes" of transportation rather than different providers of the "same
mode"of transportation.
- B.)Shipping rates should be deregulated to allow efficient direct
competition with "other modes" of transportation.
- C.)Rationalization (Abandonment) or
Implementation (Construction) of services and right of way should reflect practicality and demand rather than litigation but
keeping in mind that with concessions on right of way taxes and service subsidies this is not a permission to run to dispose of
marginal services and lines without thought and future planning. Where everyones best interest is considered, responsible local
operators may be brought in to maintain and improve the level of local services.
- D.)In general; the
governments position is this: Railroads should be given every break in the book to rebuild themselves into strong organizations
that can meet the future unencombered by irrational demands to preserve and/or pay for unneeded services or be a public welfare
agency (commuters).
- Recognizing that their future viability and employment is tied to the railroads health they
are willing to be very flexable. By attrition, with state legeslative approval, they are willing to crew reductions, hour based
instead of mileage based pay scales for operating crews. Goal is 3 man crews with job interchangability into other job descriptions
during time of employee attrition as needed to support full employment.
- 1.)Have
embraced the flexability of trucking but have discovered that, when handled efficently, intermodal rail transportation of
trucks on trips greater than 200 miles makes economic sense.
- 2.)Prefer to work with railroads, a
mode of transportation they are familiar with, but need to have their confidence restored in its dependability and ability to meet
their changing needs.
- Wants updated, and cleaner transportation from the railroads with more convenient
expanded scheduling. Consideration in freight route planning will be important to avoid conflict with passenger routes.
Street:
- Is intrigued by this new found railroad opportunity and are up for the job of financing the whole affair.
Liberally.
- ..............................................................NOW THAT WE ARE IN RAILROAD HEAVEN.................................................................
Aroostock, Grand Trunk plus Canadian lines in New England, Maine Central, Central of Vermont, St. Johnsbury & Lamoille County,
Rutland, Boston & Maine, New Haven (Poughkeepsee bridge intact) and Delaware & Hudson. The New York Central will contribute
the Boston & Albany but not Selkirk yard as well as trackage rights on the West Shore line with purchase option. To provide long
distance haulage to the area and decrease the terminal nature of the region also included are:Lehigh & Hudson
River, and Erie (not merged yet). The Lehigh Valley,
Lackawanna, Central of New Jersey and Susquehanna are being considered for inclusion into a possible "Penn Central" like
combination but nothing is cast in stone
yet.
- .................................................................................THE QUESTIONS ARE..............................................................................
- 1.)Is
this a good railroad/route combination? What would your choices be?
- 2.)Is it valuable to go as far
west as Chicago?
- 3.)Should you go further west? Rock Island? D&RGW? WP? Milwaukee? (Can you save
the lost) etc.
- 4.)What lines in New England would form your primary main lines? secondary lines?
branch lines? abandoned lines?
- 5.)What Abandonments would you take back? Which ones would you
take back to move freight off heavy passerger lines?
- 6.)What lines outside New England would form
your primary main lines? secondary lines? branch lines? abandoned lines?
- 7.)What Abandonments
outside New England would you take back? Which ones would you take back to move freight off heavy passenger
lines?
- 8.)What lines, if any, would you spin off to shortline operators?
Why?
- 9.)Would you want suburban and long distance as well as major passenger line (Shore Line, etc)
ownership & responsibility (with freight trackage rights) placed in the hands of govt. agencies (MBTA/Amtrak) or retain them for
direct subsidy of losses?
- 10.)What shops would you keep? abandon? sell to passenger agencies if
applicable?
- 11.)What yards would you keep? abandon? upgrade? downgrade? Make into hump yards?
specialized facilities (intermodal hubs, etc.)?
- 12.)What new facilities would you build for
intermodal, loose car, passenger services? Where?
- 13.)What long distance passenger services (if
applicable) would you retain, discontinue, reinstate, introduce?
- 14.)What freight services and
routes would you promote, introduce, retain, discontinue, reinstate?
- 15.)How would you operate it
efficently? handle local freight? Through trains? Switching?
- 16.)What questions, "perfect world"
scenarios or conditions would you add or delete from this list?
- 17.)How would you market it? What
would the slogan on the side of your car be?
- 1.)What does
your railroad look like?
- 2.)What would your color scheme look
like?
- 3.)What would your logo look like?
- 4.)What (if applicable)
would you name your passenger trains? special service freights?
- 5.)Would you maintain a stable of
"Heritage Equipment", "A steam department a la UP?"
- 6.)What would your taste in motive power run
to? Are you a GE man or GM man? Remember this is a "perfect world", if you want you can be an ALCOholic! Hell, in a perfect
world you can buy the plant and save it too! Its in Schenectady and theoretically on line after all! I wonder if building your own
locomotives would be an antitrust violation?
Think about what railroads would be like if common sense had prevailed? We might still have some of the quaintness. With todays
preservation consciousness think of what might still be around or even still in use? Imagine "Ski Trains" ,working and patronized
long distance trains and efficent, frequent freight service to all customers not just the unit train purchaser. So when your bored
at work, sitting in commuter traffic, milking the cows, or mowing the lawn (er...I mean....shoveling snow), Build your fantasy
railroad, rebuild New England to your liking, imagine it running, and working! But by all means, share it here! I'd love to know
what yours would look like, and operate like!!!