Railroad Forums 

  • Search

  • Search it up!

Search found 532 matches

 Return to the advanced search

Re: Interesting Consist Discussion for the North Side

 by chrisf ¦  Fri Feb 19, 2016 5:18 pm ¦  Forum: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) ¦  Topic: Interesting Consist Discussion for the North Side ¦  Replies: 622 ¦  Views: 193018

Wouldn't surprise me if they couldn't get all the locomotives on the South Side refueled yesterday/last night and moved what they could from the North Side (presumably a few North Side locomotives have ACSES for this sort of eventuality). With the exception of the leased F40s, all the revenue fleet...

Re: Motive Power update

 by chrisf ¦  Sun Feb 07, 2016 10:50 am ¦  Forum: New York, Susquehanna & Western - Past and Present ¦  Topic: Motive Power update ¦  Replies: 443 ¦  Views: 172125

All of EMD's Dash-2 locomotives of the SD series(38, 40, 45, 40T & 45T) rode on a common 68' 10" frame. The "tunnel motors" are nearly 2 feet longer than their brethren with standard radiators, approximately 70' 8". Source: http://utahrails.net/loconotes/SD40-2_T-2.php"...

Re: Proposed Revised CR Schedules for 2016

 by chrisf ¦  Thu Feb 04, 2016 10:23 am ¦  Forum: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) ¦  Topic: Proposed Revised CR Schedules for 2016 ¦  Replies: 175 ¦  Views: 37789

A lively forum in Mansfield last night on the proposed Providence line schedule changes. There was much opposition to the elimination of most Ruggles stops for Providence trains (but every Stoughton train will stop at Ruggles?) and the elimination of the short-turn train 842 7:26 departure from Man...

Re: Retirements and Disposition of CR Equipment

 by chrisf ¦  Tue Feb 02, 2016 7:58 pm ¦  Forum: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) ¦  Topic: Retirements and Disposition of CR Equipment ¦  Replies: 899 ¦  Views: 287462

It certainly did if it was just in service a few days ago. I think my real point was lost... it seems to make no sense for the T to be scrapping what it had obviously recently deemed the most viable MBBs when there are many others that have been sitting idle for several months. It's not as if there...

Re: Retirements and Disposition of CR Equipment

 by chrisf ¦  Tue Feb 02, 2016 7:19 pm ¦  Forum: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) ¦  Topic: Retirements and Disposition of CR Equipment ¦  Replies: 899 ¦  Views: 287462

Type 7 3684 wrote:NETransit isn't constantly updated to show what's in and out of service.
No, but I was on 502 just the other day. It definitely just recently went out of service.

Re: Retirements and Disposition of CR Equipment

 by chrisf ¦  Tue Feb 02, 2016 2:09 pm ¦  Forum: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) ¦  Topic: Retirements and Disposition of CR Equipment ¦  Replies: 899 ¦  Views: 287462

GP40MC1118 wrote:From what I'm hearing, the 502 will be next...

D
502 was just in service, and is still listed as assigned on NETransit, I'd have thought that there must be others that are closer to junk.

Re: Viewliner II Delivery/Production

 by chrisf ¦  Tue Jan 19, 2016 5:38 pm ¦  Forum: Amtrak ¦  Topic: NPCU/Cab Car Future ¦  Replies: 38 ¦  Views: 7255

despite the extra overhead in them being rostered locomotives. Again, as far as the FRA is concerned, a cab car, whether it's an NPCU, an ex-Metroliner, or otherwise, is a locomotive. That one of them was built from an F40PH means nothing in terms of government regulations. Remember that the Metrol...

Re: 2016 Commuter Rail Delay Discussion Thread

 by chrisf ¦  Mon Jan 18, 2016 9:43 pm ¦  Forum: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) ¦  Topic: 2016 Commuter Rail Delay Discussion Thread ¦  Replies: 520 ¦  Views: 137623

Type 7 3684 wrote:Somebody has been hit by a train in Melrose. Trains in the area are stopped.
Unfortunately, another fatality, per the MBTA Transit Police.

Re: Second Ruggles CR platform

 by chrisf ¦  Tue Jan 12, 2016 2:41 pm ¦  Forum: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) ¦  Topic: Second Ruggles CR platform ¦  Replies: 66 ¦  Views: 48753

F-line to Dudley via Park wrote:Northeastern's been hit with all sorts of contractor delays on that building, which is running way past-due on completion. They're the ones holding it up.
The building isn't scheduled to open until fall, so it's not exactly "past due" even if it's running behind.

Re: Second Ruggles CR platform

 by chrisf ¦  Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:47 am ¦  Forum: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) ¦  Topic: Second Ruggles CR platform ¦  Replies: 66 ¦  Views: 48753

I found within the MBTA FY15-19 Capital Plan that the project does indeed appear to be funded (see attached PDF of a cut and paste from the report). Anyone have any idea when construction might begin / finish? With the newly proposed schedules that have all inbound AM Stoughton trains stopping at R...

Re: Reliability

 by chrisf ¦  Fri Jan 08, 2016 2:06 pm ¦  Forum: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) ¦  Topic: Reliability ¦  Replies: 8 ¦  Views: 4097

RailBus63 wrote:Those numbers are for January-March 2015 when everything went to hell in the winter storms. I don't see any more recent reports.
They are, but the older reports don't indicate significantly better numbers.

Re: Reliability

 by chrisf ¦  Thu Jan 07, 2016 11:56 am ¦  Forum: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) ¦  Topic: Reliability ¦  Replies: 8 ¦  Views: 4097

Wonder how the T does in comparison. MBTA makes this information public: http://www.massdot.state.ma.us/Portals/0/docs/infoCenter/performancemanagement/Q3_Report_2015.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; MBTA commuter rail was at 2,227 miles between failures in Q3 of fiscal ...

Re: MBTA Red Line runaway train from Braintree Station

 by chrisf ¦  Sat Jan 02, 2016 8:53 pm ¦  Forum: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) ¦  Topic: MBTA Red Line runaway train from Braintree Station ¦  Replies: 120 ¦  Views: 33932

Head-end View wrote:What do they mean by not securing unattended equipment? In what way should it have been secured?
The NTSB gave this suggestion in their report:
Immediately implement redundant means of preventing unintended rail car movements, such as wheel chocks or a derail device.

Re: MARC To Purchase Siemens Chargers?

 by chrisf ¦  Fri Dec 11, 2015 10:01 pm ¦  Forum: DC - Maryland - Virginia Area Passenger Rail: MTA(MARC), VRE, WMATA(Metro) ¦  Topic: MARC To Purchase Siemens Chargers? ¦  Replies: 85 ¦  Views: 26585

I get everything you just said other than load balancing propulsion. How does having two MP36s not dramatically increase the propulsion power? It would, significantly. The engines would be MU'd together, same as freight engines. There's no "load balancing" going on. Amtrak isn't sending 1...

Re: MARC To Purchase Siemens Chargers?

 by chrisf ¦  Fri Dec 11, 2015 9:29 pm ¦  Forum: DC - Maryland - Virginia Area Passenger Rail: MTA(MARC), VRE, WMATA(Metro) ¦  Topic: MARC To Purchase Siemens Chargers? ¦  Replies: 85 ¦  Views: 26585

The double-loco boosts the HEP so the propelling loco can single-task, the HEP loco can single-task, and the whole consist wastes less energy compartmentalizing the relative strain that gets put on the power plant(s). In general, this is incorrect. When two, properly functioning passenger engines a...

  • 1
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 36