by Off Pending
Steamtown Observer wrote:Dare I say that even if you had a location (Jersey City, Camden, Phillipsburg, a corn field in Warren County) that the bulk of the URHS "collection" is not worthy of being in a museum. How many GG1's do we need? E units and F units painted for railroads that are the favorites of URHS leadership - they would never be allowed into a properly accredited museum. And then there's the famous "it never ran in NJ" Hickory Creek. Do we fill out the exhibits with second hand Jersey Builder coaches - how many is enough? Well at least there is the Susquehanna S2 from the first Class 1 in America to dieselize; oh wait they gave that away. Well we can show a PRR MP54; oh that's right we missed a deadline to move it so it no longer belongs to us. No steam locomotives, no Ingersol Rand pioneer diesels, no long distance passenger cars, just the leftovers given to them in the 80's.I would have to agree with you on that point. There are a few genuine artifacts in the collection (the CNJ and PRR GP7's), but way too many recreations in the collection. Becoming accredited (which can mean the difference in obtaining grants) would be a difficult task. The most valuable pieces to a prospective mueum in NJ are scattered across the country, already in museums that will never gime them up.
I think the reason a museum never got off the ground (aside from the people issues) is that with nothing really important enough to be in a museum no one was convinced to help build one.
Heck ... the URHS had at least TWO opportunities to try and obtain a genuine Erie E-8, but were too busy playing with the Hickory Creek and their two "fakes" to be bothered with it. Sad.