I don't doubt that Amtrak would want the T to move some trains to the Fairmount line to run more trains on the NEC, but I could see some pushback against this. One is that I am sure a good chunk of folks on Franklin would not want to lose a one seat ride into Ruggles/Back Bay. Secondly is that if trains over Fairmount were to make all the stops, it would add at least 10 minutes if not more to the ride into South Station. One other thing is I get the feeling the T would like to run more Foxboro service, which would also add to the number of trains, which is also driving this.
I don't see a transfer at Readville as being viable and I think the easier way would be to take a five minute train ride to Back Bay from South Station, which actually has been done in the past.
It's true that most NEC trains don't stop at Readville, but there is still a need to maintain a station along the NEC there. For one, if Hyde Park has issues, Readville is a perfect temporary replacement. Secondly, it may be in the future that the schedulers find it better for Readville to serve NEC trains, and Hyde Park Franklin trains.
Long term what I see happening is for a fourth track to be laid between Forest Interlocking and Read Interlocking. When the line was electrified, one of the contractors I spoke to about it said that he felt this would happen, and the Electrification project made provisions for this. This would require the track 3 Platform at Hyde Park to be replaced, but it would add some capacity into a bottleneck area. I think this would be an easier way to deal with capacity issues on the NEC. I could also see three tracks being extended past Read all the way to Canton Junction as well, especially if the South Coast rail phase 2 is built to extend Stoughton down to FR/NB.
I don't see a transfer at Readville as being viable and I think the easier way would be to take a five minute train ride to Back Bay from South Station, which actually has been done in the past.
It's true that most NEC trains don't stop at Readville, but there is still a need to maintain a station along the NEC there. For one, if Hyde Park has issues, Readville is a perfect temporary replacement. Secondly, it may be in the future that the schedulers find it better for Readville to serve NEC trains, and Hyde Park Franklin trains.
Long term what I see happening is for a fourth track to be laid between Forest Interlocking and Read Interlocking. When the line was electrified, one of the contractors I spoke to about it said that he felt this would happen, and the Electrification project made provisions for this. This would require the track 3 Platform at Hyde Park to be replaced, but it would add some capacity into a bottleneck area. I think this would be an easier way to deal with capacity issues on the NEC. I could also see three tracks being extended past Read all the way to Canton Junction as well, especially if the South Coast rail phase 2 is built to extend Stoughton down to FR/NB.
Last edited by CRail on Tue Jan 30, 2024 12:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Unnecessary quote removed. Do not use the quote button as a reply button.
Rich "Dino" Martin
A one time happy rider of Arborway and the old Washington St. El.
A one time happy rider of Arborway and the old Washington St. El.