Railjunkie wrote: ↑Wed Mar 02, 2022 10:29 amIn a land long ago and far away, the NYCRR did a study on hanging wire from Croton Harmon (where the 3rd rail ends) to Buffalo. They came to the conclusion it was cost prohibitive back then when labor was cheap. Now you have Metro-North who most certainly isn’t going to pay for catenary and NYS doesn’t have the money. Traveling a little further north, along with your money issues you will hear the calls of the ever present NIMBY. People who live along the river paid big $$$$$ to do so. They will not want it spoiled by cat poles and wire. Spuyten Duyvil bridge is the least of the issues.
When exactly did the NY Central do this? and why would they consider installing an incompatible system to their long-standing third rail electrification that would require them to adopt an electric fleet like the New Haven RR (which that RR did not require to use NY Penn), not to mention one that would invite a hostile takeover from main competitor PRR? During the era when a major railroad would seriously consider electrification, their other main traction power would have been steam power, whose operating costs depending on volume hauled by a particular railroad line were considerably higher than electric; and diesel-electric would not have given enough of an impetus to further consider electrification in any cost-benefit analysis. (And the end of third rail back in the era when such considerations would have affected the NYC most was Croton North, actually.)
I have heard the NIMBY excuse before, and if (alleged) NIMBYs are not bothered by views obscured by high-voltage pylons, then catenary wire on adjacent railroads would be the least of their worries versus property values, property tax assessments and quality-of-life issues in their immediate neighborhoods.