Railroad Forums 

Discussion of Canadian Passenger Rail Services such as AMT (Montreal), Go Transit (Toronto), VIA Rail, and other Canadian Railways and Transit

Moderator: Ken V

 #527075  by NS VIA FAN
 
jp1822 wrote: I'd still like to see if patronage would increase if the Chaleur were to directly serve Quebec City......Would seem it would take about a half hour for the Chaleur to get from Charney to Quebec City and then another 1/2 hour for it to return. But a reverse move or wye would have to be involved at the Quebec City station I believe.
Possible.....Yes.....But time-wise.....A long detour!

An eastbound Chaleur via Quebec City would first arrive in Charny as it does now then proceed over the Quebec Bridge to Ste-Foy then on to Gare du Palais. It's 17 miles and with terminal trackage and a stop in Ste-Foy this would take 30 minutes.

You would probably want to wye the train first just north of the station where corridor trains are turned now, then back in. If it’s a long train, this would permit as many cars as possible to be on the platform. (Gare du Palais has a fully enclosed garage like train-shed with high-level platforms) So add another 30 to 45 minutes to turn the train, fuel/service and unload/load passengers.

Now it’s 17 miles and 30 minutes to retrace the route back to Charny. Here the Chaleur would take the east leg of a wye (not currently used by passenger trains) into Joffre Yard properly positioned to continue east.

A few minutes would be saved by not having to back out of Charny to West Jct. to continue east into Joffre Yard as the Chaleur does now but you’re probably still looking at adding at least an 1 1/2 to 1 3/4 hours to the current schedule to serve Gare du Palais.

Perhaps the Chaleur should originate/terminate in Quebec City and anyone continuing on to or from Montreal would connect to a fast corridor train at Charny similar to what passengers on VIA’s “Saint-Laurent” did in the 1980's. (Schedule below) I don’t know the stats on the origin/destination of Chaleur passengers and who would be better served..........Is Quebec City or Montreal the bigger market?

This was a non-issue until 1998 when the CN line thru Levis was abandoned and VIA was forced to start using the freight line thru Joffre Yard making Charny the stop on the south shore of the Saint Lawrence River with a shuttle bus to/from Gare du Palais. Prior to that VIA stopped at Levis (almost in sight of Gare du Palais, a mile away across the river) Here you boarded a ferry (right at the Levis station) for the 6 or 7 minute crossing to Quebec City. VIA even advised passengers (see the note in the schedule below) that they could leave the train and take the ferry over to Quebec to save time instead of continuing all the way around to Gare du Palais. I think this is the same purpose the bus shuttle serves now. Does a Montreal-Gaspe passenger really want 1 1/2 to 1 3/4 hours added to their trip?

An interesting “railfan” trip you could take when the Saint-Laurent was running was to board it in Quebec City. The Saint-Laurent was actually towed backwards (engine on the rear) on the tail end of a corridor train as far a Charny. Here the trains were separated in the centre with the corridor train continuing west to Montreal and the Saint-Laurent east to Mont Joli. After 1 1/4 hours and 25 miles you were now in Levis and only 1 mile from where you had started on the opposite side of the river! Just board the ferry to return.

<IMG SRC="http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2005-8/1064906/levis.jpg" WIDTH="220" HEIGHT="240"></IMG> click on image to enlarge

 #527183  by jp1822
 
They need to get the Chaleur into Montreal in order for servicing, so I don't think Quebec City as a terminus for this train would be good. That said, I guess Charney would contnue be the best choice for the "Quebec stop" as I don't think it would be too wise to end the Chaleur in Quebec as opposed to Montreal. Lot of traffic is picked up for the Chaleur between Montreal and Charney. I'd be curious as to how much patronage the "Charney-Quebec City" shuttles brings to the Chaleur. The "change of trains" at Quebec late at night or early in the morning would not be too passenger friendly. If the "detour" could be minimized to an hour, that would be more plausible. But again, this train has a quick turn at Gaspe to consider.

 #527200  by NS VIA FAN
 
jp1822 wrote:They need to get the Chaleur into Montreal in order for servicing, so I don't think Quebec City as a terminus for this train would be good......
And I wonder if there would be even be enough clearence for the Chaleur's Skyline Dome to enter the train shed at Gare du Palais.

 #527358  by Ken V
 
Another possiblity to consider: As I recall, the tracks between Charny and Levis are still in place and active (for CN to serve Ultramar) and it's only further east that the line has been abandoned. Would it be practical for the Chaleur (and possibly the Ocean) to continue on to Levis and then back up?
jp1822 wrote:I'd be curious as to how much patronage the "Charney-Quebec City" shuttles brings to the Chaleur.
I've heard the shuttle often does not run at all as there are no passengers booked in either direction for that day.

 #527387  by NS VIA FAN
 
Ken V wrote:Another possiblity to consider: As I recall, the tracks between Charny and Levis are still in place and active (for CN to serve Ultramar)
Tracks end at St-Romuald approx. 7 km from the former VIA Levis Station on the waterfront. The abandoned line passing the station (and ferry terminal) is a walking/biking trail
 #527557  by jp1822
 
Consider also that most passengers would likely be heading off to bed once the Chaleur arrived in Quebec City on the eastbound run and on the westbound run, passegers for Montreal would either still be asleep or just waking up. So "sleeping passengers" likely wouldn't notice the extra hour or 1.5 hours added to the Chaleur's time. Problem is it would need to leave Montreal around 6 p.m. and then return from Gaspe around 15:15 to make up some time.

The Hudson Bay train makes a "detour" out to Thompson and Amtrak's Silver Star makes a "detour" to serve Tampa! And that's done mostly during day time hours. It's just a matter of what the Quebec City market will bring to the Ocean or Chaleur by making the detour into Quebec City.

 #534317  by Dieter
 
This thread has me scratching me head.

I thought The Chaleur and The Ocean were a combined train at this leg of the journey, and that The Chaleur wasn't it's own train until it departed Matapedia, heading towards Gaspe. Shouldn't you be talking about "The Ocean" in regards to getting in and around Quebec City?

D/

 #534380  by NS VIA FAN
 
Dieter wrote:This thread has me scratching me head.

I thought The Chaleur and The Ocean were a combined train at this leg of the journey........D/
They are now but beginning on June 15 they will operate as separate train for the summer.

See this thread:

http://www.railroad.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=50599