Deadline at Waterville is down to the 52, 51, and several of the GP40s that have been dead for years. Several more of the GP9s are by the shops, and PAR 1/2 were outside, coupled together elephant style.
Railroad Forums
Moderator: MEC407
NRGeep wrote:Does the amount of locomotive leasing which PAR engages in represent a long term business plan or more of a reactive/band aid approach towards their depleted power? Is it cost effective in the long term to continue leasing and not invest in bigger used or newer power which many of the leased units seem to represent? Is the volume of leasing by PAR comparable to other regionals?Leasing is an easy way to quickly acquire needed power, with much lower up front costs than an outright purchase. They have more important things to do with their money. You can lease power economically, but I don't think you can lease ties, rail and rock and MOW stuff is getting priority over locomotive purchases.
KSmitty wrote:VRS runs with no leased units.I believe VRS is currently leasing a few GP38-2s from GATX. I've seen several pictures of them on the NERAIL photo archive. In the past they've also leased SD70Ms and SD90MACs (neither of which performed very well, from what I've heard).
Dick H wrote:According to Fritz Gerhardt's file on the VRS operationsThanks much for the info. I know they had leased some stuff in the past, but didn't know they currently had anything.
in the VRS/Rutland Yahoo Group, last updated in 2013,
the VTR roster showed three leased GP38-2 locomotives:
GMTX 2189, LLPX 2334, GMTX 2663.
VRS also has two leased GATX GP38-2 locos, #2208 and #2215
currently in use.
CN9634 wrote:Shes missing the dynamic break fan.... looks like the grid is intact but who knows if it has working dynamics... But at the same time, can it but much worse than the GP40s already on property :DNone of the GP40s on already on property have working dynamic brakes either.