by nydepot
No house next to the bridge in the aerial from 1 year later than the photo.
ctclark1 wrote:Were it not for the thought that the EB track should be the one out of service, I'd almost say it could be here with a very shortened field of view...
Oh, sorry, here is an older picture. The bridge was replaced after the line came out. The thing that stands out to me is if you zoom in towards the bridge on the overhead, there's a definite dark line on the side of it, indicative of the girder you can see in the picture.
Barring that, I'm still almost positive the second number is a 9. The first number really looks like a 2 to me, but I guess it could be a 3, they both have that curve on the top. I can pretty well make out the tail of the 9 in the second spot though, so I'm fairly certain about that one.