Railroad Forums 

  • Is it important to have qualified people doing track work and inspections?

  • Discussion relating to commuter rail, light rail, and subway operations of the MBTA.
Discussion relating to commuter rail, light rail, and subway operations of the MBTA.

Moderators: sery2831, CRail

 #1628739  by Rbts Stn
 
I'm no Transit Professional, but I'd think those were important responsibilities. But according to the Globe, the MBTA disagrees with me: https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/09/07/ ... r_Headline
MBTA workers responsible for checking subway infrastructure for defects either didn’t understand their responsibilities or didn’t fulfill them and, as a result, missed dangerous problems on vast swaths of the subway as recently as March, according to a new report.

The review, commissioned by the T after the agency implemented more than 100 new speed restrictions across the system earlier this year, also found that many workers in charge of inspecting the system’s tracks don’t have enough experience or training.

The new speed restrictions suddenly slowed down commutes for hundreds of thousands of people in the Boston region, deepening dissatisfaction with the state’s largest transit system. The report, together with an analysis from the T’s own safety department, offers riders a new view of the beleaguered agency’s dysfunction that has created such extra-painful commutes in recent months.
I'd like to assume someone(s) will lose their jobs because of this but I know better.
 #1628746  by jbvb
 
Yes, track inspection by people who don't know what they're looking for or don't have time to look/test is a waste of time, money and effort. Particularly at transit traffic levels, there's a lot of wear on rails, especially in curves, and on turnouts points, frogs and guardrails. Some defects, like incipient rail cracks, are easier to find with electronic detectors than by listening as you hit the rail with a hammer, but wear, tie deterioration and loose fasteners are still mostly human territory.

Over the last 40 years there's been a lot of cost-cutting pressure on the MBTA from the limo-riders in the State House. This has left the T lacking in a lot of formerly in-house departments, and low-bid contractors are usually slow, even if no other shortcuts are taken. This was particularly evident in how long it took Guilford/Pan Am to accomplish some signal projects I endured.
 #1628852  by eolesen
 
Rbts Stn wrote:I'm no Transit Professional, but I'd think those were important responsibilities. But according to the Globe, the MBTA disagrees with me: https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/09/07/ ... r_Headline
MBTA workers responsible for checking subway infrastructure for defects either didn’t understand their responsibilities or didn’t fulfill them and, as a result, missed dangerous problems on vast swaths of the subway as recently as March, according to a new report.

The review, commissioned by the T after the agency implemented more than 100 new speed restrictions across the system earlier this year, also found that many workers in charge of inspecting the system’s tracks don’t have enough experience or training.

The new speed restrictions suddenly slowed down commutes for hundreds of thousands of people in the Boston region, deepening dissatisfaction with the state’s largest transit system. The report, together with an analysis from the T’s own safety department, offers riders a new view of the beleaguered agency’s dysfunction that has created such extra-painful commutes in recent months.
I'd like to assume someone(s) will lose their jobs because of this but I know better.
You want to fire someone because a bunch of senior people retired without training their replacements?. That happens in every agency and company.

Sent from my SM-S911U using Tapatalk

 #1628905  by Arborwayfan
 
Or trained for those positions now?! Or assigned to positions they are qualified for?! Makes zero sense to punish people who were assigned by a superior to do work they weren't qualified for. Save firing and general punitive reactions for people who lied about their qualifications, lied about doing the work they were assigned to, cut corners when they knew better, etc. (I don't know which of those happened here.)
 #1629144  by wicked
 
Management deserves every single bit of blame here. The rot starts from the top. If there are issues below, management needs to step in and address them — even if they’re personnel based. Union employees can be fired, contrary to what any anti-union proponent will tell you. I’m certainly not bragging about this, but I was in a union and fired once upon a time (although not for a performance issue… long story). But if you have bad management that won’t put in the time to rectify bad situations, you’re going nowhere.
 #1629565  by R36 Combine Coach
 
wicked wrote: Wed Sep 13, 2023 2:41 pm Management deserves every single bit of blame here. The rot starts from the top.
From what has been mentioned, it seems the problems of senior officials in management go back to the Weld
era.
 #1629741  by wicked
 
ExCon90 wrote: Wed Sep 13, 2023 10:14 pm There are also management cultures where the staff knows the boss doesn't like bad news or people who pester him with it--so he doesn't hear any.
Which is what happened when Jim K managed every transportation agency/division in the state and refused to hear everyone tell him that the Big Dig was doubling in price.