by ceo
PraiseX6 wrote:I can't answer "why" I can only go by what I was told. I wasn't a fan of the "S" name but it was S for 2 reasons and I can't recall them (I'll ask him next week I promise guys). Also as I said in an early post it will be in the SULLIVAN AREA (That doesn't mean the stop is going to be called SULLIVAN) I didn't choose why they picked NS but I liked the idea because I originally came up with that idea! (If you notice early in this thread) Don't worry guys next meeting I will be attending and I can ask all of your questions. Sadly it's not open to the public yet :). Does the idea have flaws? Of course it does but thats were they are heading.What meeting is this? I'm on the mailing lists of several of the advocacy organizations concerned with the Green Line extension, and this is the first I've ever heard of this nonsensical idea. And they're not even close to any final decisions about station locations etc. and none of those decisions will be able to be made without extensive public input. I think someone, and I'm not saying it's you, is making stuff up.