CF, that one guy on the "other" forum who swears the Valley NEVER had a Tuscan loco, is why I don't visit there. The amount of LIES posted there, make it hard to learn anything from a visit. Here's some pics, of Cornell, and Tuscan, on same locos/models, and the difference is very real.
NEW Tuscan paint:
Cornell red, on the flanks of the freshly painted C-628, # 630, April 1975
NEW Cornell paint:
Dirty Tuscan paint:
Dirty Cornell paint:
Tuscan 420 in used paint:
Cornell used paint, on a 420:
The guy who swears Tuscan didn't exist, is living in a fantasy world. While it could be said that "chemically" speaking, Tuscan is a derivative of red, it's plain to see it's a different color. The Valley well documented it's foray into the world of Tuscan, and Jade Green. There's no doubt about it. The F's and the RS's are also proof, along with the 200, of use of Tuscan. I do have a photo in my collection of an Alco PA, in Tuscan, as well, the 608! Why it's more fun here, where the BS isn't allowed to pass, as fact. Keep on "Flyin' the Flag"............
For Tadman, I would say probably not. I will guess there were no Maroon C'628's. There was Cornell red, and there was Tuscan, But I haven't seen a photo of a Maroon C-628 before. I have a picture of a Maroon hack, and a Baldwin with a very brief coating of Maroon, but not a C-628. Not to say it didn't happen, but I have over 200 photos/slides of the C-628's, with every unit being in my collection, with every paint scheme they ever wore, but I see nothing Maroon. Some older photos and slides look kind of like Maroon, but when you see other things in the pic, like green sky and grey people, you must believe the colors have shifted, or were wrong, from the first processing. Some model manufacturers, have painted stuff Maroon, but it's wrong. (how hard is it to duplicate Cornell red? It's available from Dupont as well as Sherman Williams, as automotive/railroad paint. If you took every type of model paint, claiming to be Cornell Red, you would see none of them are the same, and most of them are wrong, for new paint, although, at some point in time, the locos weathered, faded and/or darkened enough, where each offering "could" be right, for a specific loco, in a specific time frame) Harder still, was the well documented, and published fact, that the Valley was very "economical" in it's paint department, mixing and matching colors in-house, as the need to paint forced them to add any colors available, to "stretch" a batch of paint. This means a loco painted in May 1973 could, and probably would, be a different shade of Red, than the same model loco, painted in August. The documentation of such colors as green, blue and even white added to Cornell Red, to make a batch large enough to paint a loco, is seen in Carl Steckler Jr's book "The Lehigh Valley Diesel Paint Roster". The comments came from the Sayre paintshop crew themselves. So, while Dupont might have the "perfect" formulation for Cornell Red, it might in fact have been rarely, if ever, applied to a Valley unit, without being "blended" before being sprayed. As we Valley modelers know, from experience, figure out which loco you want to model, what year you are modelling, and what month you are trying to capture. The differences were just that great, and the locos went through "color changes" constantly, as red paint is probably the hardest color, to keep as a "true" color, due to oxidation, chalking and/or fading. Jst some thoughts. Regards.....