Vermont pretty much skipped last summer's spike, and didn't have the third wave as strongly as some other states. Riding the train may be safeish in itself, and discouraging travel isn't a perfect preventative, but as people move around and go to esp indoor attractions more, more people get sick. It's nonsense to say that their restrictions were never going to work. We might disagree with each other about how many deaths per capita are acceptable. We might disagree about how to account for the economic costs of lost lives, lost productivity, medical care, lost business due to sickness, etc. We might agree that the tiny number of Amtrak passengers into and out of Vermont are probably irrelevant to the overall public health picture, which might be the strongest argument for bringing back the train sooner. But the precautions have tended to reduce sickness and death AND the economies of states with successful stronger precautions have mostly suffered less than the economies of states with weak precautions (Michigan has done better than Indiana, with fewer deaths and better economic results, for example).
Fearmongering? Over half a million dead in a year and it's fearmongering to say this disease is dangerous? When am I supposed to be afraid, then? We worry as a society about much smaller numbers of deaths from car crashes, other transportation wrecks, violence, opiods, etc., etc. Even if someone wants to write off the very old and the immune compromised as somehow not real deaths, at least half the dead are not in that category.
Moderator, I suggest deleting my comment and the previous one and maybe a couple more, and maybe locking up the thread, as you have often told us not to argue Covid on here.
Vaccine appt for next week!