by andegold
andrewjw wrote:Two key facts are being ignored in your calculation:The link I included was to a vegetarian research organization. It admittedly used low percentages as compared to other sites. It reported approximately 3% on a nationwide basis, and agreeing withyour assumption of higher rates among wealthier populations 5.4% for the Northeast. That is why I used that percentage and an Acela. The number of customers I calculated was based on a sold out Acela and 5.4% vegetarian population. I agree that some percentage of the general population will also eat vegetarian options. But let's also accept the facts that: (a) not everyone on the train will eat something; (b) not every train is a sell out; and, (c) these options have a shorter shelf life than others. That all translates to it being a very expensive option to stock other than perhaps for a sleeper train that could and should make better use of modern logistics such as pre-ordering meals the same way such options would be done on an airliner.
Vegetarianism is more prevalent among better-off people.
Non-vegetarians might order the vegetarian wrap for health or personal preference reasons.
I would be HIGHLY unsurprised if more than 5.4% of orders were the vegetarian option, no matter what the preferences of the members of this forum may be.