octr202 wrote:Just to be preemptive, I fully understand and acknowledge the issues that would be involved in bringing commuter rail in house (politics, labor contracts, etc), but the back and forth that always ensues between the MBTA and the contractor (whomever it is) would be eliminated if we ended this arrangement. Not saying it's necessarily the way to go, but this appears to be the big downside. Instead of figuring out ways to improve the CR system, we're left in a debate about trying to blame the other party for the failures. I fear if this gets any nastier, this could end up in lawsuits between the T and Keolis over the absolute mess of issues, from staffing levels to replacement of equipment. Keolis can blame (with some creditability) that they were handed an under-maintained physical plant and rolling stock, and also that promised new equipment as been delayed. The MBTA will no doubt counter with all the evidence it can find where it feels Keolis undercut maintenance or staffing. In the end, the lawyers will go round and round, and little changes to improve service. That's the downside to our current situation.
Well...you don't just turn on a dime and bring CR operations in-house. That was part of the reason it was ruled impossible in the last contract negotiations. It's a transition you have to start planning for years in advance, much like the transition that happened when Conrail shoved all its inherited commuter rail operations onto the states. That took a decade to accomplish, with Metro North's 1983 founding being the last major operation they finally expunged from their operating responsibilities.
Keolis has 7 years left on its base contract. Years 8-12 are vested in two 2-year options. I don't think there are any early opt-out provisions. If they really want to bring it all in-house that's a process that they realistically have about 2 years to debate, then start a 5-year transition plan to get their house in order for the takeover. Keolis might be a little put out by that, but so long as they have their 8 years there's not really anything they can do about it. Odds are they're going to need most of that time to get themselves ready for the in-house era. They have to budget for those necessary fleet replacements of all 200 remaining single-level coaches and all ~45 remaining legacy locomotives or 2020's going to be carmageddon all over again. They have to make up for lost time on their flagrantly late and underfunded start on the PTC mandate (which if they don't hurry up and muscle some funds soon, a 5-year deadline extension might not even be enough). Not to mention just general-purpose state of repair. They can't transition themselves into a first-time self-operator when the inner half of the Worcester Line is still a FAILroad without $100M in signal replacements and crossover installations, if the motive power has to be duct-taped together, and if they're constantly forced to debug signal problems and switch heater problems and speed restrictions over falling-apart bridges. It's too hard. Amtrak wouldn't touch that situation, MBCR stopped trying to live within those restrictions, and Keolis is already balking. They'll drown if they make no meaningful progress against the backlog before they have to run their own wreckage. So those 7 years till Day 1 of self-ops have to be put to good use catching up on their procurements, catching up on their mandates, and catching up on their state-of-repair. Bigtime.
None of this happens without the Legislature appropriating money and opening up new revenue sources. It took all of 2 days after the systemwide collapse for Speaker DeLeo to slam the door on any notion of taking that up...and he is the singular keeper of the state's purse strings. It's the same answer for everything: the Legislature has to do this. The Governor, even if he wanted to, can't initiate it alone when he's functionally a distant third on the most powerful pols in state office after DeLeo and Senate Prez Rosenberg. Patrick tried to do something, and DeLeo made an example out of him by chopping the funding legs out of his big transit bill. That's what happens when a Governor tries to take the bull by the horns on anything the Speaker and/or Senate Prez. isn't 100% on-board with. And they're not on-board with T reform. That doesn't leave a whole lot of practical options for weaning the commuter rail in-house. Although at least with 7 years to go on the Keolis base contract they've got a couple years to debate this before it's go/no-go on hashing out a transition plan. I wouldn't get my hopes up, but 2 years is a lot of time for arms to get twisted and attitudes to change. So while not hopeful, it's not completely hopeless that they'll get around to this. But they probably will need all 7 years to hash it out and get the transition right.