Push/Pull Master wrote:With the proposed BRT/LRT along the Blvd, I think it's safe to assume that a Blvd subway will never happen. I guess we should all try to enjoy dreaming of transferring from a light rail car to the Broad Street Line at Erie. At least it's some type of transit in the Northeast.
Agreed. If light rail becomes the form of mass transit that gets implemented on the Blvd, have the route make its way over to Erie Station for a free transfer with the Broad Street Line. Yes, build an underground interchange at Erie - it would be the next best thing to a one-seat ride from the Northeast that the subway extension was supposed to bring. And if they go with LRT, it might make sense to also restore Route 56 as a rail route with "Transit First" signals and more substantial car stops.
Does anyone know what the latest word is on the proposed Blvd LRT/BRT? Or is it still just that - a proposal? I thought I read something about DVRPC conducting a new study for mass transit on the Blvd that would include LRT and BRT alternatives - but not subway or elevated heavy rail (shame, because that's really what the Northeast needs). But that was last year and other than a few blog articles, that seems to be all I've been able to find online about the proposed Blvd LRT/BRT. If they're no longer going to consider heavy rail, then I sure hope they choose LRT as the preferred alternative. Bus Rapid Transit should not be the "end-all, be-all" solution to the Blvd's mass transit issues. Rather, it should be a sort-of "interim solution" - as in implementing elements of BRT like off-board fare collection, striped bus lanes and Transit First signals on the existing Blvd bus routes all while the rail line is under construction.