Not to mention only about a 45-minute trip down robustly-built truck route NH 16 to Ossippee transload, which NHN is expanding in hopes of leveraging its newly-upgraded 286K/Class 2 mainline to bait some more truck biz on that highway corridor. If Nestle wants long-distance rail transport, does the inconvenience of running a truck caravan 35 miles to Ossippee to a well-funded and well-connected carrier still end up better value than the pain and suffering of reactivating 45 miles of Mountain Div. for a 5-hour trip to Rigby and possibly having to recruit some shortline more credible than those Golden Eagle scammers into doing haulage because today's PAR may not be as interested in doing multi-day trips to single customers down podunk branchlines as pound-foolish old Guilford?
And if Nestle were playing the long game, would they see an interregnum of Ossippee truck transload to NHN and future lobbying for a Conway Branch restoration instead as a better gambit than the lonely trip west out of Portland? Conway restoration's already had restoration costs pegged far lower than Mountain restoration in the feasibility studies because of the much shorter distance and fewer structures to rehab, and has more immediate revenue upside to tap with NHN going on-the-record with enough interest in the Madison quarry to offer self-funding share for the project and Conway Scenic having major upside. I remain convinced that of all the fanciful schemes for reconnecting the Mountain to the east end (and all of them are some major degree of fanciful), if any have a real-world snowball's chance it's only by Conway and never by Westbrook. Restore the middle of the C branch, and then it's only 6 miles and a Saco River bridge rehab from the eastern limits of CSRX's active territory to reach downtown Fryeburg from the back door.
I know NHDOT never spends any money on anything rail ever and MEDOT is only too glad to do so when it's a marginal branchline...but honestly, Nestle gets further making this a bi-state effort and lobbying NHDOT with the Ossippee transload teaser as a conduit for future investment. At least that adds one more for-profit party to the small...but real...coalition that sees moneymaking upside in Conway Branch restoration. It's not clear whether Rigby-Fryeburg could ever amortize its initial upgrade costs.
And if Nestle were playing the long game, would they see an interregnum of Ossippee truck transload to NHN and future lobbying for a Conway Branch restoration instead as a better gambit than the lonely trip west out of Portland? Conway restoration's already had restoration costs pegged far lower than Mountain restoration in the feasibility studies because of the much shorter distance and fewer structures to rehab, and has more immediate revenue upside to tap with NHN going on-the-record with enough interest in the Madison quarry to offer self-funding share for the project and Conway Scenic having major upside. I remain convinced that of all the fanciful schemes for reconnecting the Mountain to the east end (and all of them are some major degree of fanciful), if any have a real-world snowball's chance it's only by Conway and never by Westbrook. Restore the middle of the C branch, and then it's only 6 miles and a Saco River bridge rehab from the eastern limits of CSRX's active territory to reach downtown Fryeburg from the back door.
I know NHDOT never spends any money on anything rail ever and MEDOT is only too glad to do so when it's a marginal branchline...but honestly, Nestle gets further making this a bi-state effort and lobbying NHDOT with the Ossippee transload teaser as a conduit for future investment. At least that adds one more for-profit party to the small...but real...coalition that sees moneymaking upside in Conway Branch restoration. It's not clear whether Rigby-Fryeburg could ever amortize its initial upgrade costs.