by sixty-six
blockline4180 wrote:Paging Dr. Cruiser for confirmation on this... Dr. Cruiser please report.Haven't we already made enough threads on the topic already? Use the search feature.
Railroad Forums
Moderators: lensovet, Kaback9, nick11a
blockline4180 wrote:Paging Dr. Cruiser for confirmation on this... Dr. Cruiser please report.Haven't we already made enough threads on the topic already? Use the search feature.
checkthedoorlight wrote:You CAN couple the ML's to the comets and still operate a moving train, but then some of the features of both sets of trains will not work properly. I believe it kills the sign displays, and the emergency call boxes.It's not a matter of "CAN" it's a matter of NJT doesn't want to "mix and match" multilevels and single level equipment. I am sure the Club went down that road as an alternative if most of their members go to NYC and now they are starting all over again on a new routing.
blockline4180 wrote:Paging Dr. Cruiser for confirmation on this... Dr. Cruiser please report.firthorfifth06 has pretty much nailed down the issue on this one. For those who ride trains 3224 and 3269, expect to find a 9ML set waiting to pick you up on Monday. I for one am sorry to see the club car relagated to Hoboken service as I have a close friend who is a member and he's the guy who really nurtured my interest in the railroad. Hopefully the club will be able to garner some new interest from theose on the lower Coast Line. As that weirdo says, "the times they are a changin' ".
cruiser939 wrote:Thanks, so that will make two ML EP sets laying over in Long Branch??blockline4180 wrote:Paging Dr. Cruiser for confirmation on this... Dr. Cruiser please report.firthorfifth06 has pretty much nailed down the issue on this one. For those who ride trains 3224 and 3269, expect to find a 9ML set waiting to pick you up on Monday. I for one am sorry to see the club car relagated to Hoboken service as I have a close friend who is a member and he's the guy who really nurtured my interest in the railroad. Hopefully the club will be able to garner some new interest from theose on the lower Coast Line. As that weirdo says, "the times they are a changin' ".
blockline4180 wrote:Yes.cruiser939 wrote:Thanks, so that will make two ML EP sets laying over in Long Branch??blockline4180 wrote:Paging Dr. Cruiser for confirmation on this... Dr. Cruiser please report.firthorfifth06 has pretty much nailed down the issue on this one. For those who ride trains 3224 and 3269, expect to find a 9ML set waiting to pick you up on Monday. I for one am sorry to see the club car relagated to Hoboken service as I have a close friend who is a member and he's the guy who really nurtured my interest in the railroad. Hopefully the club will be able to garner some new interest from theose on the lower Coast Line. As that weirdo says, "the times they are a changin' ".
Rail Boy wrote:It's funny becasue the Commet III's IV's and V's weren't supposed to be coupled together and NJT has no problem doing that. The destination signs and door all fail on those from what I am told, and I was told that it is because they were not designed to be mixed and matched. It just surprises me that NJT is worried about the disfunctionality of the ML's when mixed with other equipment, yet on the same token, it could care less about the disfunctionality caused by mixing various types of single level equipment. If they were to change all of the single level's back into solid sets, it would be a different story.Coupling the different cars up isnt a problem.
jimzim66 wrote:It's when you try to MU them electronically that the problems arise. Getting all those silly safety features to function properly through a mixed outfit is... but who needs safety stuff anyways!Rail Boy wrote:It's funny becasue the Commet III's IV's and V's weren't supposed to be coupled together and NJT has no problem doing that. The destination signs and door all fail on those from what I am told, and I was told that it is because they were not designed to be mixed and matched. It just surprises me that NJT is worried about the disfunctionality of the ML's when mixed with other equipment, yet on the same token, it could care less about the disfunctionality caused by mixing various types of single level equipment. If they were to change all of the single level's back into solid sets, it would be a different story.Coupling the different cars up isnt a problem.
jimzim66 wrote:ehhhhhhhhh i wouldn't quite say that...........the ML couplers can be quite tempermental, and there is now a SI that states that MLs should not be coupled to the compromise couplers of MUs - of course that only matters in the yard or in equipment moves, but its a real pain sometimes.Rail Boy wrote:It's funny becasue the Commet III's IV's and V's weren't supposed to be coupled together and NJT has no problem doing that. The destination signs and door all fail on those from what I am told, and I was told that it is because they were not designed to be mixed and matched. It just surprises me that NJT is worried about the disfunctionality of the ML's when mixed with other equipment, yet on the same token, it could care less about the disfunctionality caused by mixing various types of single level equipment. If they were to change all of the single level's back into solid sets, it would be a different story.Coupling the different cars up isnt a problem.