Railroad Forums 

  • F40PH-3C overhaul program

  • Discussion relating to commuter rail, light rail, and subway operations of the MBTA.
Discussion relating to commuter rail, light rail, and subway operations of the MBTA.

Moderators: sery2831, CRail

 #1639379  by dowlingm
 
BandA wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 5:17 pm New passenger locomotives are kind of expensive with long lead times. They would probably want to buy locos that would pull 8 double-deckers at 79 MPH or even faster to future proof. And they would have to be Tier-IV. So basically would have to go to the back of the line behind Amtrak. Better to overhaul everything they already own first.
Metrolink are ordering 12 x Tier 4 which will result in T2 MP36s being disposed of. There are other MP36 operators like Metra who might have designs on them, and it is a few years away at best either way.
 #1639392  by BandA
 
Metrolink is the only customer so far for the EMD F125, of which there are 40, same as the MBTA's HSP-46. Prime mover is a Catepiller C175-20.
 #1639513  by diburning
 
dowlingm wrote: Sat Feb 24, 2024 8:25 pmMetrolink are ordering 12 x Tier 4 which will result in T2 MP36s being disposed of. There are other MP36 operators like Metra who might have designs on them, and it is a few years away at best either way.
Isn't there some California law that says that if they replace older locomotives with new T4 compliant ones paid with state money, that they need to completely destroy the old locomotives to ensure that they do not end up on the secondary market?
 #1640109  by alasgw
 
Anyone able to get a plate check on 1033 to see what its rebuild date is? TIA
 #1640222  by alasgw
 
1029 has never been to MPI. Wabtec is performing the rebuilds at their Erie, PA facility.
 #1640245  by alasgw
 
It is still at Erie pending rebuild, along with other MBTA units. As long as Wabtec completes the rebuild program within the time frame specified by the contract none of the units involved are "stuck" there.
  • 1
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69