by Cowford
Chill out, dude. It's pretty clear that your "realists" comments were directed to me, but I could care less. And I didn't mean the sunshine comment to be nasty and I'll edit it out.
Railroad Forums
Moderators: MEC407, NHN503
NNR wrote:Reffering to the Belfast situation people need to look at both sides of the argument the railroad forfitted their lease it was only around 500 amonth they were far behind in payments and a local politican i believe a selectman even said he was very upset with how the railroad just pulled up and left there was never any plans for that property. Most people are quick to jump and defend the railroad. But come on it was a mismanaged now bankrupt operation railroads can be at fault.Never any plans for that property?! The town had BIG visions to turn the waterfront into a yuppie mecka with luxury condos. See how far they got with the old Stinson plant. A skeleton since the contractor pulled out. Nothing like walking across the rebuilt foot bridge and ending up next to that carcass. Perhaps some better parking, but barely closer to developing it than they were when B&ML was supposedly behind on rent. That cracks me up in itself since the railroad contributed directly to what the waterfront was in its best days. I think both sides should let the dust settle and perhaps iron out some kind of deal. The rails do still come into town under the Route 1/3 overpass and are still walking distance to downtown, too. I wanna say the past owners of B&ML still have a section of rail between the active Brooks Preservation portion and the downtown Belfast connection.