Railroad Forums 

  • Model Railroad GPS

  • Discussion related to everything about model railroading, from layout design and planning, to reviews of related model tools and equipment. Discussion includes O, S, HO, N and Z, as well as narrow gauge topics. Also includes discussion of traditional "toy train" and "collector" topics such as Lionel, American Flyer, Marx, and others. Also includes discussion of outdoor garden railways and live steamers.
Discussion related to everything about model railroading, from layout design and planning, to reviews of related model tools and equipment. Discussion includes O, S, HO, N and Z, as well as narrow gauge topics. Also includes discussion of traditional "toy train" and "collector" topics such as Lionel, American Flyer, Marx, and others. Also includes discussion of outdoor garden railways and live steamers.

Moderators: 3rdrail, stilson4283, Otto Vondrak

 #558436  by gprimr1
 
I was reading my model railroader magazine and I saw an ad for model railroad GPS. (RPS-mrr.com)

The set is 400 dollars but it claims to be able to control signals and track trains without having to install block detectors and such. I'm really tempted to buy it for my next layout.
 #558445  by Chessie GM50
 
I have got two letters to describe it...BS
A- it would detect people walking in the room.
B- the only way that this would work, is to put a chip in everything for detection, and another chip in the signals.

p.s. which magazine was this in?
 #558469  by gprimr1
 
I am having some trouble figuring out how you would work the signals. It was featured in Model Railroader and it also says it is featured at the Model Railroad show in Anaheim.

Yes, there is a transmitter that has to be installed somewhere in the consist.

If it works, I'd pay for it, I'd love to avoid the headache of wiring.
 #558524  by boblenon
 
I think the key here is that is a detection system. ... it knows where trains on the layout. Yes, it does require putting a "transmitter" in locos (in addition to dcc decoder)... the system's receives position info and can hand that off to JMRI ... which can control signals - which you'd still have to wire up. But you don't need to modify any track wiring because all blocks are virtually defined based on the physical location sensed from the system.

You could use it to simulate blocking on transit systems, where by the block shifts with the train and it's speed.
 #558599  by Otto Vondrak
 
Chessie GM50 wrote:I have got two letters to describe it...BS
A- it would detect people walking in the room.
B- the only way that this would work, is to put a chip in everything for detection, and another chip in the signals.
So just how long have you been an electrical engineer?

Check out the web site, they have documentation... it seems to work in cooperation with your existing DCC system.

-otto-
 #558605  by gprimr1
 
I might be the test subject for this. I really like the idea of using my laptop to control my layout.
 #560026  by stilson4283
 
I actually watched this work at Anahiem last weekend and it worked with the two RDCs they were using. It controlled both locomotives and all signals on the little 4x8 they had. It also showed on the computer the "traces" that the software said that the locomotives took. It kept track of the trains pretty well saying that you are dealing with a space of 4x8.

Chris
 #560048  by Ken W2KB
 
stilson4283 wrote:I actually watched this work at Anahiem last weekend and it worked with the two RDCs they were using. It controlled both locomotives and all signals on the little 4x8 they had. It also showed on the computer the "traces" that the software said that the locomotives took. It kept track of the trains pretty well saying that you are dealing with a space of 4x8.

Chris
One would need to have a transponder in both the head and rear end of a train for it to properly operate signals. Or be able to specify a train length in the programming. Otherwise it would not be able to detect when a train cleared a block, only the location of the loco or car with the transponder.

An single RDC is short enough to make the issue moot for the most part.
 #571939  by Blexcroid
 
I just received my Beta test unit. I will be installing it shortly. :-D
 #571967  by conrail71
 
Cool, write it up as an article/ review. I'd be interested in the instalation process as well as any problems you run into along the way.

Mike
 #572309  by Dieter
 
...........$400......... I spent that much once on a brass locomotive that runs like junk. That's $100 cheaper than the Playstation 3 my son just bought......

Glad I have Cab Control, it saved me a fortune.

D/
 #572642  by Otto Vondrak
 
What does any of that have to do with this product? If you are not already using DCC, then yes, this GPS product is probably not for you. I don't think price is an indication of quality or not.

-otto-
 #574504  by Dieter
 
Otto Vondrak wrote:What does any of that have to do with this product? If you are not already using DCC, then yes, this GPS product is probably not for you. I don't think price is an indication of quality or not.

-otto-
OK - My sentiment is; $400 for a 4X8 sounds like something between extreme overkill to a needless extravagance. It handles traffic, tracks traffic, runs your signal system. Do you really need that if where you're running isn't out of sight with heavy traffic?

How large a layout can it handle, and what is the justifiable need?

D/
 #574814  by Otto Vondrak
 
Agreed, DCC to run your 4x8 is a waste... but remember that just about every engine comes out of the box now DCC or DCC ready... DCC can be adapted to any size layout, but if you're seriously looking at this "GPS" system, then you obviously have a model railroad of some size that requires some level of control to keep trains from bonking into one another. I don't think anyone is trying to see you this system to run your average Sawdust Central...

-otto-