Gilbert B Norman wrote:Finally, regarding Mr. Trainview's immediate thought, I have to wonder at what level would the second "corridor' frequency be funded. There will be no new Federally funded routes or frequencies - a doctrine that has stood since the Bush administration. So far as State funding goes, need we address at this topic how train friendly Tallahassee has been of late? So far as adopting a model of County level funding as exists for Tri-Rail (and planned for SunRail), good luck getting the nine on-line counties (did I count 'em right?) to impose the required "ear marked" tax (a "Sales Tax" in the case of Tri-Rail) in order to obtain matching State level funds.
Well, the state of Florida has put up a considerable amount of funding for SunRail. $461 million to buy the tracks from CSX for example. Checking the SunRail website, the state of Florida will be providing the operating subsidy and maintenance costs for SunRail for the first 7 years of operations, then the local governments are supposed to take that part over.
When Gov. Scott canceled the Tampa to Orlando HSR project, he got a huge amount of backlash and an earful from state politicians from both parties. But, once he canceled it to satisfy his tea party backers, he could not back down, so the project was dead. With his approval rating among the lowest of any governor in the US. I suspect he learned his lesson from that mistake and decided not to get in the way of SunRail and the FEC project.
While there is a lot of speculation here on what the plans are for the FEC, the Florida 2010 HSIPR applications and documents for the FEC project can be found at
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rail/HSIPR-F ... ation.shtm. These documents lay out in detail what the plans and projected costs were in 2010 for restoring passenger service over the FEC. Not a lot of mystery here. That application was for $250 million of federal funding with a state contribution of $123 million for $373 million total. The project proposal had three phases:
Phase 1: $250 million for track work, crossover connection in West Palm Beach, 8 new stations with pullover sidings & 1000' plus long platforms where feasible, 29 miles of track & curve upgrades for 90 mph speeds, the Silver Star split at Jacksonville and a single Miami to Jacksonville corridor train. Amtrak supplies the equipment.
Phase 2: $115 million for rolling stock acquisition for 3 additional daily corridor trains between Cocoa and Miami.
Phase 3: $25 million for rolling stock acquisition for one additional corridor train between Jacksonville and Cocoa (which is a rather odd approach).
The question is how much Florida can accomplish with $118 million plus whatever the local governments are willing to provide to build the stations, platforms, and pullover tracks. If someone wants to dive into the cost numbers to figure our what could be done with $118M, they are welcome to do so. My guess is that some or much of the track, signal, and curve work to achieve 90 mph speeds over much of the route gets postponed for future funding. If Amtrak provides the equipment for the corridor service, this will be Horizon cars available in 3+ years.
As for the corridor service, that will have to be funded by the state. The Silver Star will provide a corridor type service, but Amtrak expects improved cost recovery, so it is a plus for the federal subsidy. In the 2010 application: "FDOT has committed to fund up to $5.3 million a year of the projected operations and maintenance deficit for Phase 1 through
FDOT’s 5-year Work Program." of course, that was in 2010. However, there is no guarantee that Amtrak would run the corridor service. The state could decide to bid that. On the other hand, who else has intercity passenger cars available and a complete service facility near the future Miami intermodal station?