by MattW
Doesn't the Denton A-Train use a european model of DMU that's only modified a little bit now? Or do they still have to operate under a waiver, and time separation?
Railroad Forums
Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, nomis, FL9AC, Jeff Smith
CTRailfan wrote:I think Tri-Rail is or maybe I should say was the only operator of DUM equipment and it has not been considered any kind of a success here. It has crapped out with passengers on the road several times, they had two train sets and I don't think they have ever been able to run both of them at any one given time. They might be all right on a scenic railway or tourist line but I don't see how they will amount to anything for a common carrier. By the way, I would not consider Tri-Rail a "small operator", we have 25 round trips a day and the line is about 70 miles end to end, a lot of equipment and a fair number of employees as well. The trains carry a good load of passengers, don't believe me? just look at the parking lots on a weekday.F-line to Dudley via Park wrote:Difficulty: proven AND scalable. None of this spitballing meets either criteria, let alone both.CRC got it right, they just got stuck in the chicken and egg problem here. So then the question: who breaks the chicken and egg problem and gets enough of these things running to make it appealing for other agencies to run them? There are only a handful of relatively small operators running DMUs at the moment, and two of those are branch lines off of light rail systems.