dowlingm wrote:Do we need to rename to WI Talgos - MI Talgos - now CA Talgos? (assuming 31 is the correct number of Talgo cars in Beech Grove...)
http://www.railwaygazette.com/news/news ... unced.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Two Talgo trainsets (a total of 31 cars) are to be leased for five years to operate between Los Angeles and San Luis Obispo, offering reductions in journey times of 25 min.
http://www.masstransitmag.com/press_rel ... il-service" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Talgo Rail Equipment: Provides a five-year capital lease, including maintenance, for 31 rail cars to replace aging trainsets.
That lease for both train sets is for 5 years and for a total of $15 million. I'm not sure that includes maintenance.
Each ex-Wisconsin train set had 14 cars, with three spares; both end cars and the bistro car. That does add up to 31 cars.
http://archive.jsonline.com/news/wiscon ... 48321.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Under Doyle and a Democratically held Legislature, the state agreed in 2009 to a no-bid contract to buy two new train sets from Talgo Inc. for Amtrak's Hiawatha line, which runs from Milwaukee to Chicago, for $47.5 million as well as additional trains for a proposed Madison to Milwaukee line.
Talgo, a Spanish company with U.S. headquarters in Seattle, was paid $42.2 million for the trains before the lawsuit, according to the state Department of Transportation. The state expended millions of dollars more for a temporary maintenance base and planning for a permanent base, spare parts and consulting fees.
The manufacturer ended up suing Walker and Transportation Secretary Mark Gottlieb seeking a clean title to the trains — and also sought an additional $10 million as a final payment on them — and has reached a settlement that largely achieves that, said Lester Pines, an attorney for Talgo. If the manufacturer is able to sell the trains, it will return 30% of the net proceeds of the sale, up to a limit of $9.7 million, to Wisconsin.
With this $15 million 5 year lease, Talgo has balanced the books in building them. Because it is a lease and not a sale, Wisconsin doesn't get 30% of the $15 million. Sweet!
Link to photo of the three spare cars
http://media.bizj.us/view/img/2866801/t ... -0-432.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Link to photo of 14 cars in a train set
http://media.bizj.us/view/img/2796111/t ... -0-276.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Their relatively shorter height makes these trains look extremely long, one might think too long for the existing station platforms, but they are only about half as long as a traditional rail car, so the 14 car Talgo train is about the same length as a 7 car Superliner/Surfliner train.
Each Superlunar/Surfline car is around 85 feet long, each Talgo car (except possibly the cab car) is around 42.5 feet long.
Some math follows.
42.5 feet x 14 cars = 595 feet = 85 feet x 7 cars
Assuming they use the same available locomotive, no differences in length. But do all Surfliner trains use 7 cars? Do they use more? From the initial YouTube videos I'd watched, they using 6 Surfliner/Superliner cars today.