Railroad Forums 

  • Abandoned Commuter Rail Stations

  • Discussion relating to commuter rail, light rail, and subway operations of the MBTA.
Discussion relating to commuter rail, light rail, and subway operations of the MBTA.

Moderators: sery2831, CRail

 #603993  by A320
 
juni0r75 wrote:
Ron Newman wrote:But even if the station building was no longer available, why didn't the T put the new stop in the same place as the old? The Kendal Green station in Weston is now a private residence, for example, but the train still stops there.
Part of the logic around modern CR construction is the assumption that the riders will use their cars to drive in from more distant suburbs (or exurbs in the case of some areas) and use th train to get into the city, thereby maximizing the transport corridors into the city by reducing the number of cars on the freeway. The old idea of CR being suburban passenger service meant that the towns often grew up around the transport hub (station) and promoted foot traffic. People would walk or take the bus (streetcar) to the station and leave their cars at home (if they even had them). With our town centres mostly built-out, it is difficult to justify leveling a large area for the cars that people will use to get to the stations.

When most original station sites were chosen in cities and towns, very few if any people even owned an automobile; so, no thought was given to providing a place to park them. Passengers were usually dropped at the station by horse and carriage, or, as the poster above suggested, the stations were centralized so as to be accessible by foot.

The same was true of the second generation of major league baseball parks, like Fenway. They were sited to allow people to either walk or take a streetcar to the game, as again, few people had cars. That's why there is such limited (and outrageously expensive) parking around Fenway Park today. When the third generation of ballparks were built in the late 60's and early 70's, they were moved outside of the inner city, and surrounded by acres of parking lots.

When my dad commuted on the old B&A from Framingham in the early 60's, he had to find a parking space at the curb along Waverly St. (The trains boarded at the old station platform at that time. I still remember seeing the green REA trucks there.) If we had to pick him up at the station -- in those days, most families had only one automobile -- we would have to park to wait for the train in a little lot across from the old Framingham News building, off of Howard St., near that old hotel that is remarkably still standing.

Obviously, to accommodate today's mobile society, modern commuter rail stations must provide parking for customers, which makes it almost impossible to use the old stations, or station sites. A good example of this old and new contrast in station siting is Newburyport. The old station was tucked neatly close to downtown, surrounded by residences. The new station was located a mile or so south, outside of downtown, and is surrounded by three large parking lots, which see plenty of business.
 #604015  by 130MM
 
juni0r75 wrote:
Ron Newman wrote:But even if the station building was no longer available, why didn't the T put the new stop in the same place as the old? The Kendal Green station in Weston is now a private residence, for example, but the train still stops there.
Part of the logic around modern CR construction is the assumption that the riders will use their cars to drive in from more distant suburbs (or exurbs in the case of some areas) and use th train to get into the city, thereby maximizing the transport corridors into the city by reducing the number of cars on the freeway. The old idea of CR being suburban passenger service meant that the towns often grew up around the transport hub (station) and promoted foot traffic. People would walk or take the bus (streetcar) to the station and leave their cars at home (if they even had them). With our town centres mostly built-out, it is difficult to justify leveling a large area for the cars that people will use to get to the stations. Even if stations are available for purchase or reuse (eminent domain could be used by the Commonwealth if the MBTA thought that reclaiming stations would be in the best interests of the line's restoration), the T often would rather build a purpose-built station with adequate parking and road connections to better maximize the line's use. For example, the only town centre station on the restored Middleville/Lakeboro line (that I can remember) is in Brockton, which had the space to support moderate parking (I think about 200 spaces?). At the same time, East Bridgewater station was available to reopen as a stop (it housed a Burger King last time I was out there) and the T instead decided to build a station nearer to East Bridgewater State with better parking availability and access for the students which would make an excellent weekend market for service into Boston. It is unfortunate that CR service cannot meet both needs and allow for service to both out-of-town stations for parking and town centre stations for foot traffic and local business.
During the Greenbush project, the towns had a lot to say about where the stations were to be built. Cohasset and Scituate didn't want downtown stations. I believe their fear was that people "from away" would drive into their towns and clog their streets. Ironically, there has been some noise about putting these stations back downtown as the businesses are looking at lost revenues as the customers get in their cars and drive home. Thereby not spending any money at there stores.

Another issue is that downtown stations are often near grade crossings. When a train makes a station stop, the gates at these crossings are down for the duration of the stop. For some reason this drives people insane. This is the reason that Weymouth Landing was built in a trough so as to not block the crossings at that location.

DAW
 #604102  by boatsmate
 
There used to be a stop In Dover. but that was many yrs ago. The last Time I was there you could still see remnints of the old platform.....

ALso on the Framingham line yu have Framingham Station, which is now moved west a little ( the rest. is where the orginal station used to be) and Lets not forget Worcester station, the old Amtrak building still stands even though the station is now Down the street.
 #604310  by ST214
 
It's not really down the street...it's right on the other side of I-290. takes about a minute walk.

BTW, the MBCR B&B Dept. uses the old Amshack there.
boatsmate wrote: and Lets not forget Worcester station, the old Amtrak building still stands even though the station is now Down the street.
 #605629  by RedLantern
 
ST214 wrote:It's not really down the street...it's right on the other side of I-290. takes about a minute walk.

BTW, the MBCR B&B Dept. uses the old Amshack there.
boatsmate wrote: and Lets not forget Worcester station, the old Amtrak building still stands even though the station is now Down the street.
They even share the same platform, sure only the new high level platform is used, but the yellow rubber platform edge runs the entire length of both station areas and in between. I suppose the only real abandoned part is the paved second platform in front of the amshack, but AFAIK that was only used for Amtrak, and not the T.
 #605759  by ST214
 
Yes, the abandoned platorm on the main....CSX ripped out the crossing in front of the Amshack a few months ago when doing trackwork on the siding. Last time i saw them use this platform was a few years ago when the siding switch at CP45 was being worked on.
RedLantern wrote:
ST214 wrote:It's not really down the street...it's right on the other side of I-290. takes about a minute walk.

BTW, the MBCR B&B Dept. uses the old Amshack there.
boatsmate wrote: and Lets not forget Worcester station, the old Amtrak building still stands even though the station is now Down the street.
They even share the same platform, sure only the new high level platform is used, but the yellow rubber platform edge runs the entire length of both station areas and in between. I suppose the only real abandoned part is the paved second platform in front of the amshack, but AFAIK that was only used for Amtrak, and not the T.
 #606053  by JUDGE DRED
 
Maybe a little off topic... has the mbta ever considered making foxboro a permanent stop? the station is already there, and there are million parking spots there(work out a lease with Krafty Bob?). I guess you would have to rebuild the line to walpole(or mansfield) for faster speeds, which should be the only big expense.

Do dreams come true? nah
 #609274  by Arborwayfan
 
Some commuter rail lines today are built with transit oriented development in mind. I remember hearing that along some of the relatively new CR lines outside San Francisco, the average lot size, number of garages, etc., on new construction had gone down, I think without anyone exactly planning it that way. Has anyone hear of apartment buildings or townhouses being built next to new CR lots (kind of ugly places to live)? Does anyone think there's actually a chance that downtown stations could be added on the Old Colony in the future if people started asking to be able to walk? Obviously you couldn't double the number of stops without wrecking the schedule, but one or two town centers could get service. People walk to the Needham Line. People walk to the Hyde Park stations. Do people also walk to the in-town stations on the other old lines that still have them? I always assumed they built the Old Colony stations and park and rides partly because after thirty years without trains there was no dense neighborhood of people wanting to walk to the station in those towns the way there is around some CR stations that have always had service.
 #1421835  by rhodiecub2
 
Ron Newman wrote:
B&Mguy wrote: Rosemont/495
Methuen
Route 213
These stations appeared on some MBTA maps, but my understanding is that they never got service. And the New Hampshire stations had no service "when the MBTA took over". That came later, and only lasted a year or so.
Was Route 213 supposed to be in Salem, NH or in Methuen?
 #1421962  by The EGE
 
Tufts actually opened on September 15, 1977. Jonathan Belcher's history had the date wrong - an extremely rare error - because it appeared in public timetables but service did not actually start. I dragged through a bunch of old Tufts newspapers last year and found the correct date, and he's since corrected it.
 #1422021  by Aerie
 
I was one of the handful of people who used the Tufts station on a regular basis. It was a flag stop for most trains. I remember on Monday of the week after the Blizzard of '78...when we were finally allowed to travel...there were about 25 people waiting at the Tufts station. Those of us who were regulars knew that an express from Lowell was due at 8:15, followed by a local from Woburn about 5 minutes later. When the Lowell express blasted by at speed, most of the people at the station cursed the railroad and left for the bus stop up the hill. Those of us "in the know" waited and probably got to Boston an hour before the unlucky bus-catchers. After the express had passed, the regulars expressed some guilt at not telling the others to wait 5 minutes. But when the Woburn train arrived, it was standing room only and it's unlikely the crowd could have been accommodated.
 #1423306  by B&Mguy
 
Is the set of concrete stairs off of the bridge at College Ave the old access point to the Tufts stop? I've tried to locate any traces of this station, but haven't been too successful. The MBTA must have eliminated traces of it pretty quickly after service ended in 1979.
 #1423312  by theseaandalifesaver
 
[quote="B&Mguy"]Is the set of concrete stairs off of the bridge at College Ave the old access point to the Tufts stop? I've tried to locate any traces of this station, but haven't been too successful. The MBTA must have eliminated traces of it pretty quickly after service ended in 1979.[/quote]

I'm not sure of the exact location but the only evidence of this station that still exists are a set of stairs that lead from street level down to the ROW. The last time I saw them was back in 2008 which is weird to think was almost 10 years ago. Everything else from this station is gone.
  • 1
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8