BostonUrbEx wrote:Red Wing wrote:I realize that. What I'm saying during the morning rush hour move the inbound trains to the center track so that all the doors open on each car and push the morning outbounds with less passengers over to the right hand track outbound. During the PM rush move everything over one track so the outbounds can open all doors like they do now. Admittedly I haven't ridden the Orange Line north of North Station since Assembly was built so I don't know how that station is set up.
Community College has an out of service platform and now Assembly Sq has no second platform. Also, I think the signal system would need investment. It seems that running wrong-iron is incredibly difficult, so I can only imagine what having a bi-directional track would do to the current system.
I don't think it's all that difficult as set up. When they had to short-turn the Red Line at Harvard for the weekend trackbed work shutdowns on the Alewife extension the trains would really fly going wrong-rail on the inbound side for the turnback. I don't think the ATO system really cares one way or the other as long as it's set up for that purpose.
It's more the fact that there's absolutely no need to run Orange in regular service on the bi-directional track unless something is messed up on one of the other two, so it's not maintained to the same standard. It would need some instructure refreshing to go at full speed.
Assembly is provisioned with the space to add the extra platform track should they need to. The MOW gravel driveway next to the commuter rail track is where things would be shifted over to create the new island, and the overhang to the lobby can have a footbridge grafted onto it over the tracks. There was just zero reason to spend the money on new construction.