Railroad Forums 

  • Derailment at East Falls Church

  • Discussion related to DC area passenger rail services from Northern Virginia to Baltimore, MD. Includes Light Rail and Baltimore Subway.
Discussion related to DC area passenger rail services from Northern Virginia to Baltimore, MD. Includes Light Rail and Baltimore Subway.

Moderators: mtuandrew, therock, Robert Paniagua

 #1398540  by Sand Box John
 
Track diagram on PDF page 7 has 2 errors. All of the signals should be on the right side of the tracks in the K98 interlockings. Turnouts 3 and 5 in the junction should be 7 and 5.
 #1412652  by JackRussell
 
JDC wrote:Metro has fired 6 employees for falsifying reports about the track conditions at EFC prior to the derailment. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/dr- ... f182596116
It goes deeper than just those 6 employees.
The transit agency said it has taken disciplinary action against 28 people since the incident occurred, representing “nearly half of the track inspection department,” General Manager Paul J. Wiedefeld said. The department consists of about 60 people.
The disciplinary action was not limited to rank-and-file workers. At least three supervisors were fired or are in the process of being terminated, and two more are facing repercussions from the incident. Two rail superintendents were also demoted.
 #1412664  by MCL1981
 
Good. Bye bye. And of course, Jackie Jeter claims it's all lies and "misunderstandings" and that they shouldn't be fired. I'm sure by evening, she'll be proclaiming the only reason they were fired is racism. That's the next page in the playbook she's been using forever.
 #1412678  by JackRussell
 
Jeter said that she has spoken to two of the track workers who were terminated.

“They are confused,” she said, “because they don’t know what they’ve done wrong.”
 #1412701  by MCL1981
 
Sitting the break room for 8 hours, then making a photo copy of the prior month's falsified report, changing the date, and signing it off as a completed inspection. And the response is "they didn't know they were doing anything wrong"
 #1413047  by dcmike
 
In the last week or so they replaced the site with a brand new design, which completely broke all old links. Try this: https://www.wmata.com/upload/082516_4EF ... Update.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;. Disappointing that no effort went in to preserving all those URLs ranked in search engines, embedded in other community resources, and stored in bookmarks.
 #1413127  by Acton Town S5
 
dcmike wrote:In the last week or so they replaced the site with a brand new design, which completely broke all old links. Try this: https://www.wmata.com/upload/082516_4EF ... Update.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;. Disappointing that no effort went in to preserving all those URLs ranked in search engines, embedded in other community resources, and stored in bookmarks.
Mike Thanks for that I noticed a few other like you say in search engines. You would think they would have ensured that the URLs were preserved.
 #1413149  by Sand Box John
 
"dcmike"
In the last week or so they replaced the site with a brand new design, which completely broke all old links. Try this: https://www.wmata.com/upload/082516_4EF ... Update.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;. Disappointing that no effort went in to preserving all those URLs ranked in search engines, embedded in other community resources, and stored in bookmarks.


Provided the archived documents were not moved from the volumes they are stored on to others, it shouldn't be to difficult to correct the UNC paths to those volumes in the httpd.conf file on the server running the HTTP daemon.