Railroad Forums 

  • [PHOTO] RDC Fan Trip Location & Date Needed

  • Discussion of the past and present operations of the Long Island Rail Road.
Discussion of the past and present operations of the Long Island Rail Road.

Moderator: Liquidcamphor

 #1488515  by scopelliti
 
Also on that page is a photo of an RDC pulling a T-54 coach (left side, right in the middle of the page). Seems like I read that this violated the warranty requirements of the RDCs - true?
 #1488530  by newkirk
 
RGlueck wrote:Absolutely true! As soon as a now Budd RDC was coupled to a Budd Car, the warranty was done - finished- kaput!
Since the Budd Co. was located in Pennsylvania, how did they find out about the breach of warranty ?

Perhaps a snitch in the LIRR ?
 #1488558  by RGlueck
 
"Captain Kirk, that's right, the warranty's dead, Jim."

I was once told that Budd had there finger on the pulse of every railroad that purchased Budd Cars. They studied publications and even spot checked. Personally, I think they had "rogue operatives" conducting interrogations, but that's unsubstantiated.
 #1488686  by BuddR32
 
I read the link about the engineer killed in that wreck. It happened on this date coincidentally in 1967. Rest his soul.

I can see why they felt unsafe, there’s really nothing to the cab structure to protect the engineer in a crash.
 #1488715  by newkirk
 
BuddR32 wrote:I read the link about the engineer killed in that wreck. It happened on this date coincidentally in 1967. Rest his soul.
I can see why they felt unsafe, there’s really nothing to the cab structure to protect the engineer in a crash.
Maybe that's why FA and F used cabs instead of a cab car for push-pull operation
 #1488726  by scopelliti
 
Also why the LIRR ran the Alcos long hood forward. BTW this topic just cost me a couple of hundred bucks.. just ordered a Rapido HO Scale RDC-2 (with DCC and sound). Aleady got the T-54 to tow behind :-D
 #1488879  by Nasadowsk
 
BuddR32 wrote:I read the link about the engineer killed in that wreck. It happened on this date coincidentally in 1967. Rest his soul.

I can see why they felt unsafe, there’s really nothing to the cab structure to protect the engineer in a crash.
Given the alloys of the day, all else being equal, I'd take my chances in a Budd than an MP-54.

Why the US still trails the rest of the world in cab car design is beyond me - I doubt a US design cab car would even be legal in most of the world, it's standard now to have an impact structure in front of the cab, which is why they all have that 'aerodynamic' look - that's where the attenuation occurs. Nobody really cares about aerodynamics when you top out at 60-90mph.
 #1488900  by vince
 
In watching cabride videos from all over the world I note that most RR's employ full four quadrant gate systems to protect their engineer / drivers from road vehicles that run around the half assed gates used in the United States.

Operation Safety be dammed. The effing railroads are NOT interested in safety, only in company profits. And a PR campaign with pretty logo's and safety 'classes' are a lot cheaper than installing the proper protection at grade crossings.

And just how much is a human life worth? Twenty percent higher cost for full quadrant gates is not that much of a cost protecting train crews AND the public idiots who seem to enjoy putting lives at risk.

Sincerely,
Vince Cockeram
Author of the LIRR Route for Open Rails Simulator http://www.openrails.org/
and soon to be released The PRR East Region v2