• Saratoga & North Creek (S&NC) Discussion

  • Pertaining to all railroading subjects, past and present, in New York State.
Pertaining to all railroading subjects, past and present, in New York State.

Moderator: Otto Vondrak

  • 431 posts
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 29
  by SlackControl
 
I didn't see anyone start a 2015 thread yet, so I figured I would. Moderators, if you want to edit or move this to make an official header for the topic, by all means.

I started this as I have a couple of questions.

I saw towards the end of 2014, talks of revenue freight from the ore mines at the north end of the line were posted. Did anyone video any of this first revenue freight movement? Any pics or videos or the empties being brought up to the mine. Has there been any other revenue freight runs since that first run from the mine with the loaded gons? Any other freight in the near or far future for this line?

Any updates to the condition of the loco that caught fire a few weeks ago?

Thanks folks.
  by D.Carleton
 
The toasted traction motor on the 8524 was replaced and the unit was returned to service.
  by SlackControl
 
I'm also curious as to how the railroad is staffed, specifically relating to train crew personnel. Are engineers and conductors on the same roster, and can an employee on this roster work as an engineer today, and conductor the next? How many are on the roster? Are there full time, part time, and volunteer positions?

Also, what kind of signal system (if any) are used? Is it dark territory with hand thrown switches off the main track? Does the railroad use a rule book based on a standard rule book?

For both of the subjects I asked about, I'm just curious. I've been very fascinated by the SNCRR ever since I accidentally stumbled upon it while vacationing at Lake George a few years ago.
  by griffs20soccer
 
I've attached an article from September 2014 about corporate bureaucracy holding up the shipment of freight by rail from the north country. It outlined the issues and how it affects doing business in the area. It directly affects SNC's ability to grow their freight business. I found it an interesting read.

https://penneyvanderbilt.wordpress.com/tag/tahawus/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Any thoughts on the topic.
Don
  by johnpbarlow
 
NYSDOT has filed its letter of support with STB for NS acquisition of D&H South lines but with 2 conditions imposed on D&H which NYSDOT argues is a de facto applicant in this proposed transaction in addition to NS:

1.) NYSDOT believes that S&NC could be harmed by this transaction because S&NC can only interchange with D&H and D&H may be disinterested given their short haul participation. Proposed remedy is for D&H to grant S&NC direct interchange with NS at Saratoga. (Opinion: Given S&NC is currently trying to ship tailings to a Hudson River port near Albany or to CSX at Selkirk Yd, I'm not sure how direct interchange with NS really helps S&NC except to remove D&H from existing east/west/south routing options with NS that apparently aren't in use today).

2.) D&H must submit to STB its intent wrt disposition of trackage rights over NS to Allentown, Oak Island, Philadelphia, and DC, which will likely be unused following NS acquisition of D&H South.

I wonder how much of an issue item (1) will become in this proceeding.


http://www.stb.dot.gov/filings/all.nsf/ ... 237484.pdf
  by newpylong
 
The tailings are their primary commodity, but not the only one - and the customer may want to unload them somewhere else at some point other than the Port of Albany - or CP might charge too much to make the operation viable. Having more than one interchange choice is always better.

They are also I am sure looking at future growth ie the old IP site.
  by griffs20soccer
 
Attached is an article about a grant the county received to study the feasibility of running SNC trains into Rensselaer station. The article contains information on the freight and passenger operations for the past year and plans for the new year.

The question of who the current contract for stone was answered. The costumer for the stone going into Massachusetts is MassDOT, to be used as ballast, and not another IPH railroad like was previously speculated.

http://www.denpubs.com/news/2015/jan/27 ... ae/?page=1&" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
  by Tony Goodwin
 
Mass DOT owns the tracks that are leased by the Mass Coastal out of Taunton, and I think I am on solid ground when I state that these tailings are not going to CSX that is the only other railroad in Taunton. I therefore would still maintain that this shipment went from one IPH company to another IPH company and in no way "certifies" that shipping tailings from Tahawus is a viable business.
  by traingeek8223
 
I believe it was just clearly stated here that the purchaser of the stone is Mass DOT, not another IP company. No amount of "ARTA spin" can change that.
  by griffs20soccer
 
MassDOT is upgrading the tracks for their seasonal operation of the Cape Flyer. Tony MassDOT is the purchaser of the stone for their track upgrades and not another IPH railroad like you have speculated over and over. The tracks as they currently are OK for Mass Coastal's purposes, however, they need to be upgraded for the MBTA's uses, so MassDOT needs ballast. Argue all you want, MassDOT is writing the checks and you saying IPH over and over won't change that.
  by Otto Vondrak
 
Tony Goodwin wrote:I therefore would still maintain that this shipment went from one IPH company to another IPH company and in no way "certifies" that shipping tailings from Tahawus is a viable business.
Tony, this would be a false statement, unless you can provide evidence?
  by Tony Goodwin
 
This gravel is being shipped over a greater distance than a similar load of gravel would ever be economically be shipped. It is coming from one IPH railroad to provide material for maintenance/improvement of another stretch of publicly-owned (MassDOT) track that is operated by another IPH railroad.

I don't know what other "proof" is required to show that this is not a sustainable market for tailings from Tahawus.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 29