SouthernRailway wrote:Sorry, wasn't clear:
In the past few decades, what drove North Carolina's commencement and expansion of funding for passenger trains on the Charlotte-Raleigh (and continuing) line, beginning in the 1980s?
Did you even read the link I posted, it answered all your questions thoroughly! Take the time to read NCRR history.
By the late 1980's with Norfolk Southern running the leased railroad, the rail corridor conditions had fallen east of Greensboro to Class 2. NS maintained the mainline sections between Charolette and Greensboro at Class 4, but treated the sections between Greensboro and Raleigh as a spur. It doesn't take a genius to figure out what NS was doing to the state owned property. NS was taking the profits generated within the state and spending it elsewhere. With the existing lease expiring, the state stepped in and stated changes will be happening, that profits generated by the railroad will be reinvested in the railroad within the state. The entire rail corridor in just a little over a decade is now at Class 4. It was the new passenger train operations that made that possible.
I don't think you can identify one individual or a political group of activists for this reversal, as much as everyone on the NCRR Board wishing to see the railroad function properly and grow. Just businessmen conducting business with the hope of generating future profits.
NCRR has picked up the entire tab normally picked up by state governments to qualify for federal grants for construction on the corridor and subsidize all passenger train operations.
It's running the passenger trains that have caused reconstruction of the entire railroad to Class 4 - otherwise it would still be Class 2 or Class 3 at best.
The decision to invest in the railroad with state funds was made back in the 1850s. The decision to buy out the last 25% of the private investors of the railroad in 1999 was the latest state investment into the railroad, with the state now owning 100% of the railroad shares - which eventually will play for itself as it pays dividends to the state coffers. That decision wasn't based solely upon providing passenger trains as much as keeping the railroad fully functional. And running passenger trains on the railroad was a result of that choice. Well, that's my take of the situation.....