by RestrictOnTheHanger
What about the interlocking at Mastic Shirley that was remoted during PD-SK signalization? Is that named after a former RR official?
Railroad Forums
Moderator: Liquidcamphor
RestrictOnTheHanger wrote:What about the interlocking at Mastic Shirley that was remoted during PD-SK signalization? Is that named after a former RR official?Isn't that one just MS 2 and MS 1? For Mastic-Shirley, mabye?
Teutobergerwald wrote:When was the Eastport siding torn up, and why?The Eastport Siding is still there, sorry I mistyped above. I meant to say the former Eastport Station before. (I've edited my post above changing it to the correct idea)
Backshophoss wrote:The temporary trackage was built like "Shoofly" tracks to slightly better "standards" due to the lenght of the trackage,So needless to say, what your saying is the Babylon Branch did not have any temporary crossover switches on the temporary tracks at Merrick, Bellmore, Massapequa Park, Amityville, Copiague, and Lindenhurst during the elevation of those stations, or did they have crossover switches at the transition of the main ROW to the temporary tracks at any of those stations or just the Waysides except at the ACL segment?
and lenght of time they were used.
If there were any crossovers put in,most likely "trailing point" crossovers,hand thrown along with any needed freight spurs.
As the tempory tracks were "cut in",MW just swung the rails from the main line over to temp trackage,
As the elavated sections were finished and ready for use,MW then swung the rails back to the mainline,
"cutting out" the temp trackage.
Backshophoss wrote:They moved the rails over,NO switches at each end of the temp tracks(Shooflys).And not in the middle either? The only signals were wayside and no crossovers? But then again I don't think they had the room on the Babylon Branch, and I didn't see anything along the temporary ROW. I do know they had to run Eastbound trains on the Westbound temp through Merrick and Bellmore one time because LB gave me photos of a grade crossing accident between an Eastbound and a car at Newbridge Road in Bellmore, and 2 photos on the same day they were cutting the temps out at Merrick and Bellmore, one had a Westbound bypassing on the Eastbound temp track, than like 20 minutes later there was a Westbound on the already connected elevated track.
MattAmity90 wrote:This thread is bouncing back and forth like a ping-pong ball. When the shoofly's are connected, freight sidings get snipped and there are typically no crossover switches installed. I can only vouch for Merrick/Bellmore & Wantagh/Seaford projects, but I doubt very much if any switches were installed on the A/C/L shoofly tracks. It's usually straight rails the whole run. Hicksville and Babylon were completely different animals, since they were major interlockings. Later in the projects they may put a switch in to conduct test runs on the elevated track before service is cut-in (as shown in Mass Park photo below).Backshophoss wrote:They moved the rails over,NO switches at each end of the temp tracks(Shooflys).And not in the middle either? The only signals were wayside and no crossovers? But then again I don't think they had the room on the Babylon Branch, and I didn't see anything along the temporary ROW. I do know they had to run Eastbound trains on the Westbound temp through Merrick and Bellmore one time because LB gave me photos of a grade crossing accident between an Eastbound and a car at Newbridge Road in Bellmore, and 2 photos on the same day they were cutting the temps out at Merrick and Bellmore, one had a Westbound bypassing on the Eastbound temp track, than like 20 minutes later there was a Westbound on the already connected elevated track.