by ExCon90
The current issue of Trains has a story on the upgrading of the Fitchburg line which mentions the existence of some surviving searchlight signals displaying G/G for Clear. I know that the B&A used G/G in the Boston area and NYC on the lines leading to GCT where the signal spacing was so close that the usual sequence -- Y/Y = Advance Approach = proceed approaching second signal prepared to stop; Y/R = Approach = proceed approaching next signal prepared to stop; R/R = Stop and proceed -- still did not provide enough braking distance for the prevailing speeds. Accordingly, they introduced an additional aspect -- G/Y = Advance Approach Medium = proceed approaching second signal at Medium Speed (30 mph), with Y/Y on the next signal and so forth. Using the normal G/R for Clear would have meant that a train having passed a succession of G/R could then encounter a G/Y, and the signal department felt that it was counterintuitive and against logic for G/Y to be LESS favorable than G/R and therefore introduced G/G to display Clear (Rule 281, same as G/R) in territory where G/Y was also used. The sequence in approaching a Stop signal would then be G/G, G/Y, Y/Y, Y/R, R/R, which made a logical progression.
My question is: Did the B&M also use G/Y for Advance Approach Medium or something similar, or was G/G the equivalent of the night aspect of the traditional 2-arm 3-aspect lower-quadrant semaphores, then still in wide use, on which G/G = Clear, G/Y = Approach, and R/Y = Stop and Proceed?
My question is: Did the B&M also use G/Y for Advance Approach Medium or something similar, or was G/G the equivalent of the night aspect of the traditional 2-arm 3-aspect lower-quadrant semaphores, then still in wide use, on which G/G = Clear, G/Y = Approach, and R/Y = Stop and Proceed?