Discussion relating to the past and present operations of the NYC Subway, PATH, and Staten Island Railway (SIRT).

Moderator: GirlOnTheTrain

  by DaveBarraza
They're not just removing a wall.

The mezzanine at the NB end of the station is being fitted out and opened. It was just roughed-in before. The area is also being used as staging for the southern portion of the new 2nd Ave construction.

The area where the G1/G2 tracks run was never finished, the last time I was in there it was completely gutted and being done over almost from the raw tunnel shell. Some of the structural columns are being removed and replaced, even affecting the T1/T2 tracks to a small degree.
  by #5 - Dyre Ave
eastwind wrote:The obvious solution to the overcrowding problem on the F line is to run more F trains. The question is, Is that even possible?

During rush hours, F trains run every 6-8 minutes. Doubling their frequency would give a 3- to 4-minute headway. But on their present route, that is not possible.
They share the Queens Boulevard express tracks with the E. Which means a 3- or 4-minute headway on those tracks, and 6- to 8-minute headways for each line. Is it possible to squeeze anything more in there? Maybe. Probably not.
F trains have the 63rd St Connector all to themselves. Likewise the Rutgers St tunnel. Doubling frequencies on those segments would be possible.
The pinch point is the 6th Av local tracks, which they share with the M. The M runs every 8-10 minutes during rush hour, so theoretically, in a ten-minute span, there might be room for one more train, giving a 3-minute headway there. But where would such a train come from?
If it can't come from east of Roosevelt Avenue (actually, east of Queensbridge), there is no other possible terminal west of there. 57th St-6th Av has not been a terminal since the 63rd St Connector opened and, being only a two-track station, would not work as one now. Broadway-Lafayette is out. The next possibility would be 2d Av, if the track layout would permit, but how useful is that? After that is Jay St, and your train is already crowded long before that.

At the moment, I don't think there is a solution.
In the future, when SAS opens, it would be possible to run two lines on Second Avenue, not just the Q down Broadway as is proposed but another line—call it the Y—that would come down 2d Av, across 63d St and down 6th Av to supplement the F. (There are crossovers west of Lex Av-63d St that would permit that maneuver, aren't there?) That would double frequencies on 2d Av and add service on the line to Brooklyn where it's needed most. If you ran it express in Brooklyn, you wouldn't need frequencies as high as the F (which would remain local at all times), say every 10 minutes, and would avoid any confusion with F-express vs. F-local.
I think it would work. Just not now. Unless...
Unless the tail tracks to the Second Avenue Subway are already in place and usable. Then you could run the Y to/from Lex Av-63d St until SAS opens. (When the lower part of SAS opens and you have the problem of scheduling Q, Y, and T on the upper SAS... that's far enough in the future that I'm not even thinking about that.)

Them's my 2 cents.
I think this is certainly a workable solution to the question of "Where do we run a Culver Express service once we get past Broadway-Lafayette?" It would still be a limited service that likely couldn't run more than every 10 minutes. But it wouldn't have to deal with the Queens Blvd Line and E and F trains could continue to run at their current rush-hour frequencies (15 trains per hour each). And having a 6th Ave-bound service in addition to the Broadway-bound Q would give 2nd Ave a choice of services, which might siphon yet more riders off of the Lexington Ave lines.

But it would have to wait until at least the opening of SAS Phase 1. There are no tail tracks in place that would make relaying trains possible at Lex-63rd.