PAR Locomotive Fleet - General Discussion

Guilford Rail System changed its name to Pan Am Railways in 2006. Discussion relating to the current operations of the Boston & Maine, the Maine Central, and the Springfield Terminal railroads (as well as the Delaware & Hudson while it was under Guilford control until 1988). Official site can be found here: PANAMRAILWAYS.COM.

Moderator: MEC407

Post Reply
backroadrails
Posts: 194
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2018 8:36 am

Re: PAR Locomotive Fleet - General Discussion

Post by backroadrails » Sun Jan 06, 2019 12:42 am

MEC 610 has been sold to GATX and is on tonight’s WAPO. GP15-1 406 departed this morning.

User avatar
690
Posts: 761
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 12:50 am
Location: Maine

Re: PAR Locomotive Fleet - General Discussion

Post by 690 » Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:54 am

Wrong info, 610 wasn't on WAPO.

backroadrails
Posts: 194
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2018 8:36 am

Re: PAR Locomotive Fleet - General Discussion

Post by backroadrails » Wed Jan 30, 2019 9:22 pm

Per a report on Facebook GATX GP40's 3051 and 3052 are headed to Pan Am, atleast one is exMEC 347.

eustis22
Posts: 324
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:23 am

Re: PAR Locomotive Fleet - General Discussion

Post by eustis22 » Thu Feb 28, 2019 6:17 pm

I probably missed it somewhere byt are all the ex-CSX locos being repainted/re-labeled as MEC vs B&M or D&H? How come?

Dick H
Posts: 3486
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 8:55 pm
Location: Dover, NH

Re: PAR Locomotive Fleet - General Discussion

Post by Dick H » Thu Feb 28, 2019 6:57 pm

All painted and unpainted GE's are lettered for MEC.
There are five (5) GP40s (300 series) with BM reporting marks.
All other PAR locos are lettered for the MEC. The two OCS
units are lettered as PAR. However, that is not a registered
reporting mark.

User avatar
690
Posts: 761
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 12:50 am
Location: Maine

Re: PAR Locomotive Fleet - General Discussion

Post by 690 » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:20 pm

PAR 1 and 2 are MEC units.

Regarding the units being assigned to the Maine Central versus B&M or D&H: Pan Am has no affiliation with the D&H and therefore can't use those reporting marks, and the speculated reason for MEC vs BM is because of cheaper taxes in Maine (where the Maine Central is based) versus Massachusetts, where the B&M is based.

eustis22
Posts: 324
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:23 am

Re: PAR Locomotive Fleet - General Discussion

Post by eustis22 » Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:12 am

Thank you.

These are still lease jobs, correct? Despite the new paint they aren't owned outright by PAR?

Dick H
Posts: 3486
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 8:55 pm
Location: Dover, NH

Re: PAR Locomotive Fleet - General Discussion

Post by Dick H » Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:39 am

If you are referring to the GE's, I believe PAR has purchased those.

KSmitty
Posts: 2037
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 1:29 pm
Location: Maine

Re: PAR Locomotive Fleet - General Discussion

Post by KSmitty » Sat Mar 02, 2019 3:43 pm

They were purchased outright, financed through "BMO Harris Equipment Finance Company, some retroactively, as the units listed on the final page as MEC are also in a previous recordation with GE listed as the lender. Though its not in the recordation, I heard the initial group of C40's was purchased for around 200K/unit, and following orders for a percentage less as they opted not to purchase warranty and GE technical service which saved pretty substantial coin.

STB recordation for 24 of the GE's its not all of them, but a good chunk anyway. More may show up, as STB seems rather slow to post recordations...
https://www.stb.gov/recordations.nsf/ec ... /32812.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

eustis22
Posts: 324
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:23 am

Re: PAR Locomotive Fleet - General Discussion

Post by eustis22 » Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:03 am

thank you

Interesting...Maine Central Railroad Company at Iron Horse, not Pan Am Railways.

newpylong
Posts: 4240
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 12:32 pm
Location: NH

Re: PAR Locomotive Fleet - General Discussion

Post by newpylong » Sun Mar 03, 2019 4:03 pm

Assets and property are largely still held by the individual railroads. Like NS and the NW/SOU. No need to go through the trouble of a $0 sale.

gokeefe
Posts: 11642
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 12:28 pm
Location: Winthrop, Maine

Re: PAR Locomotive Fleet - General Discussion

Post by gokeefe » Sun Mar 03, 2019 4:11 pm

eustis22 wrote:thank you

Interesting...Maine Central Railroad Company at Iron Horse, not Pan Am Railways.
Still registered under the 1862 charter in Maine by the way.

I was wondering about tax implications on that equipment. For example in Maine there might be business equipment taxes in the municipality in which the equipment is considered to "reside".
gokeefe

User avatar
690
Posts: 761
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 12:50 am
Location: Maine

Re: PAR Locomotive Fleet - General Discussion

Post by 690 » Mon Mar 04, 2019 6:04 am

That would be very hard to deduce, with engines constantly crossing state lines and whatnot.

newpylong
Posts: 4240
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 12:32 pm
Location: NH

Re: PAR Locomotive Fleet - General Discussion

Post by newpylong » Mon Mar 04, 2019 6:28 am

Definitively. There are no such implications.

Stp243
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 8:07 am
Location: Springfield, MA

Re: PAR Locomotive Fleet - General Discussion

Post by Stp243 » Wed Mar 20, 2019 8:54 pm

MEC 7622 seems to have some new hardware mounted on the roof directly over the cab. You can clearly see it in its most recent picture posted over at NERAIL Photos http://photos.nerail.org/showpic/?photo ... otoindex=3. Anyone have any idea what it is? It doesn't show in any other previous photos that I have found.

Post Reply

Return to “Pan Am Railways (formerly Guilford Rail System)”