Portsmouth Branch Activity

Guilford Rail System changed its name to Pan Am Railways in 2006. Discussion relating to the current operations of the Boston & Maine, the Maine Central, and the Springfield Terminal railroads (as well as the Delaware & Hudson while it was under Guilford control until 1988). Official site can be found here: PANAMRAILWAYS.COM.

Moderator: MEC407

Posts: 327
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 2:46 pm

Re: Portsmouth Branch Activity

Post by Hux » Tue Oct 01, 2019 7:22 pm

NHV 669 wrote:
Tue Oct 01, 2019 6:48 pm
"They should park the [locomotives] in true industrial areas, away from densely populated areas."
Well, they could use the old lumber yard.
You mean like a rail yard, that developers CHOSE to build homes around? The dog bites it's own tail again....
Those neighborhoods weren't built by developers.

User avatar
NHV 669
Posts: 812
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 11:07 pm
Location: In the VT woods, between the Mt. Division and WACR

Re: Portsmouth Branch Activity

Post by NHV 669 » Tue Oct 01, 2019 9:01 pm

[Individuals] who CHOSE to develop land near tracks predating them by more than a few generations, the end outcome is the same regardless of who or what paid for it.

NHVT 669 sits at the south end of the "Pompy" line in White River Jct., VT on 4/29/1993. Photo by Richard Roberg.

Posts: 1378
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 12:19 pm
Location: Hebron, Maine

Re: Portsmouth Branch Activity

Post by BM6569 » Wed Oct 02, 2019 6:42 am

New article about the fume complaints mentioned track work would be done in a week

Posts: 4274
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 12:32 pm
Location: NH

Re: Portsmouth Branch Activity

Post by newpylong » Wed Oct 02, 2019 7:41 am

I get it, I really get where they're coming from. The noise is one thing, the fumes are another. The former they have no case, the later is a legitimate concern. The railroad needs to do better on idling and where they idle. Realistically, there are not enough cars in that yard to warrant saving any air test - build a new drip pad and keep the power somewhere else. HOWEVER, these people would have more of a complaint if their houses were built prior to the rail yard. I wouldn't purchase a house next to the Interstate and then start a campaign against vehicles. It's the era of snowflakes.

User avatar
Posts: 777
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 12:50 am
Location: Maine

Re: Portsmouth Branch Activity

Post by 690 » Wed Oct 02, 2019 7:51 am

The bigger issue is that the yard is easily the most convenient place to tie down an engine. Really the only other places are either on the Newington somewhere or at Rockingham, which is a hour from Portsmouth by train, so if the crew is running short on time...

Easiest solution would be to have Portsmouth pay Pan Am to put APUs in a handful of engines, include in whatever contract above that said engines need to be used on the Portsmouth Branch, and APUs need to be maintained in working condition, except when off for repairs or inspection, and go from there.

Posts: 743
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 9:36 am

Re: Portsmouth Branch Activity

Post by oibu » Wed Oct 02, 2019 8:14 am

Since when does someone who buys and lives in a house next to the railroad tracks not live next to the railroad tracks.

It really is just that simple.

Posts: 92
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2018 5:52 pm

Re: Portsmouth Branch Activity

Post by Jonathan603 » Mon Oct 21, 2019 1:57 pm

Anyone know what is happening to the station building at Rockingham Junction? It was being painted and refurbished for a bike hire shop but work seems to have come to a halt over the last couple of months and have not seen much going on there.

Posts: 92
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2018 5:52 pm

Re: Portsmouth Branch Activity

Post by Jonathan603 » Thu Nov 07, 2019 2:09 pm

The new crossing behind the medical building on Borthwick Ave seems to be almost complete.

Posts: 78
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 6:48 pm

Re: Portsmouth Branch Activity

Post by fromway » Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:08 pm

Is there a set schedule when they do a test on lowering the Portsmouth bridge to the rail level?

Return to “Pan Am Railways (formerly Guilford Rail System)”