It's just not that easy. They don't own the trackage in question, it's CN, and CN doesn't want high platforms. Not only that, Amtrak runs Superliners and Horizons on this route, so then how do the superliners passengers get on? Now we have two platforms for each station?
Look at the real costs of the conversion of one car:
1. Remove from service and find another car to cut in to that spot $338
2. Ship that car to a shop. $3.67/mile times 184 miles - $675
3. Pay 3-4 guys all day to unbolt the chairs. 8 hours, $25/hour salary, probably another 25-40/hour in bennies. $1600
4. Cover the cost of finding other guys to take their place on whatever project they were working on. There is a cost associated with delays to capital projects. If the shop is an outside contract shop, they have a penalty clause for late work. $________
5. Pay 3-4 guys all day to bolt in proper tie-downs. 8 hours, $50/hour total $1600
6. Ship it to Chicago - would be a charge if this were a PV $675
7. Couple it to the train - would be a charge if this were a PV $330
8. Run the train, uncouple the car at the end of the run, hide it somewhere until needed to return - switching and storage charges if this were a PV $500 + $330 + $600
9. When needed again, switch back onto train - would be a charge if this were a PV $330
10. Run it back to Chicago and switch out - would be a charge if this were a PV $500 + $330
11. Ship back to shops - would be a charge if this were a PV $675
12. Two more days labor, four guys, $50/hour min - $3200
13. Back to Chicago $675
14. Back onto the normal train $330
I'm somewhere at $13,000 back of napkin. THis doesn't include charges to actually use the car. Maybe $1000/day times four days means the total is now $17,000.
We're short of $25k, but I don't have access to real historical costs.
Maybe it would be better to charter a bus or van that is especially set up for this? Maybe it would be better to take a couple different trains? Maybe it would be better to charter a PV? Any one of these solutions might not just present a more cost-competitive solution, but it might be a comprehensively better overall solution. For example, the van could deliver the passengers direct to their hotel or conference, negating a need to transfer to taxi at the station. A PV could allow the entire team to begin their work retreat by holding a conference or brainstorm without other passengers. I love the PV idea, but nope, the outrage must continue to be fed to the readers, it sells ads and helps their confirmation bias.
What would be the response from Greyhound, United, Southwest, etc?
This is abominable reporting. All it does is report outrage with little attempt made to examine the "why", no attempt made to explore alternatives and absolutely no possibility that there is a better concept overall.
The new Acela: It's not Aveliable.