Railroad Forums 

  • Search

  • Search it up!

Search found 591 matches

 Return to the advanced search

Re: Framingham and Lowell Branch

 by edbear ¦  Sat Sep 05, 2020 6:26 pm ¦  Forum: New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad NYNH&HRR ¦  Topic: Framingham and Lowell Branch ¦  Replies: 65 ¦  Views: 51153

Around 1953-54-55 there was a big derailment in the Acton/Westford area, can't say precisely where. I have seen photos of it too. Big hook was called out. Can't tell you where the photos were either, Shoreline maybe.

Re: Maine Central's - Kineo Branch

 by edbear ¦  Thu Sep 03, 2020 9:14 pm ¦  Forum: Boston & Maine (B&M) | Maine Central (MEC) ¦  Topic: Maine Central's - Kineo Branch ¦  Replies: 7 ¦  Views: 5540

The Mount Kineo House was operated by the Samoset Company, Maine Central's hotel management subsidiary. Samoset also operated the Samoset at Rockland. The Coburn Steamboat Company operated a fleet of steamers on Moosehead and connected Kineo Station with the Mount Kineo. Coburn's steamers served a n...

Re: Wabash in Buffalo

 by edbear ¦  Sat Aug 29, 2020 8:24 pm ¦  Forum: General Discussion: Fallen Flags, Trolleys, and Interurbans ¦  Topic: Wabash in Buffalo ¦  Replies: 4 ¦  Views: 2105

My August 1909 Official Guide says there was WAS passenger service across Ontario between Buffalo and Detroit. The service included those roads which would be considered secondary in the Boston/New York to Chicago market. Like Boston & Maine to Rotterdam Jct.-West Shore to Buffalo-Wabash beyond....

Re: Who did NOT use REA?

 by edbear ¦  Thu Aug 20, 2020 1:10 pm ¦  Forum: General Discussion: Fallen Flags, Trolleys, and Interurbans ¦  Topic: Who did NOT use REA? ¦  Replies: 1 ¦  Views: 800

Railway Express was owned by the railroads and I'm guessing that non-owning roads could still participate in the Railway Express business. From 1960 Moody's these roads still were carrying passengers but did not have any ownership in REA: Chicago & Northwestern, Monon, Grand Trunk Western, Centr...

Re: The Cocheco Railroad revisited

 by edbear ¦  Fri Aug 14, 2020 6:16 pm ¦  Forum: Boston & Maine (B&M) | Maine Central (MEC) ¦  Topic: The Cocheco Railroad revisited ¦  Replies: 67 ¦  Views: 8873

Some of those bridges that the Valuation Survey called culverts were probably big enough to drive a Model T Ford through if they had been over roads.

Re: The Cocheco Railroad revisited

 by edbear ¦  Fri Aug 14, 2020 6:12 pm ¦  Forum: Boston & Maine (B&M) | Maine Central (MEC) ¦  Topic: The Cocheco Railroad revisited ¦  Replies: 67 ¦  Views: 8873

With the later numbering system there could be more than one Bridge 94.08. But the route designation and/or town or nearest station name would pinpoint the location.

Re: The Cocheco Railroad revisited

 by edbear ¦  Fri Aug 14, 2020 3:31 pm ¦  Forum: Boston & Maine (B&M) | Maine Central (MEC) ¦  Topic: The Cocheco Railroad revisited ¦  Replies: 67 ¦  Views: 8873

Bridge 94.08 is probably measured from Boston. When the B & M Valuation Survey was being made as of June 30, 1914, bridges were numbered starting with 1. As to what got a number is probably lost to history, but assume there was a Bridge 41. The previous one would have been 40 and the next 42. Th...

Re: The Cocheco Railroad revisited

 by edbear ¦  Thu Jul 30, 2020 3:42 pm ¦  Forum: Boston & Maine (B&M) | Maine Central (MEC) ¦  Topic: The Cocheco Railroad revisited ¦  Replies: 67 ¦  Views: 8873

In the Tebbets to Nadeau Rd section, it looks like that is a B&M piggyback trailer. When those trailers were obsolete they were frequently sold to outfits that used them for storage purposes. At $250 each, scrap price it was much cheaper than constructing a storage building; if the neighbors com...

Re: Trackside Fueling

 by edbear ¦  Sun Jul 12, 2020 11:44 am ¦  Forum: General Discussion: Locomotives, Rolling Stock, and Equipment ¦  Topic: Trackside Fueling ¦  Replies: 1 ¦  Views: 642

On the B & M, it was done sometimes where passenger trains tied up, especially at lay up points that were created after the MBTA assumed the commuter operation; Ipswich & Ayer. In the Guilford era (B&M, MEC, D&H) there was an operations officer from the D&H who plugged the idea o...

Re: Portsmouth Branch: Emery

 by edbear ¦  Wed Jun 24, 2020 5:51 pm ¦  Forum: Boston & Maine (B&M) | Maine Central (MEC) ¦  Topic: Portsmouth Branch: Emery ¦  Replies: 15 ¦  Views: 2590

The junction of the Eastern Route Mainline and Manchester-Portsmouth Branch.

Re: Diesels with Pantographs

 by edbear ¦  Sat Jun 20, 2020 9:05 pm ¦  Forum: General Discussion: Locomotives, Rolling Stock, and Equipment ¦  Topic: Diesels with Pantographs ¦  Replies: 8 ¦  Views: 1871

There is no need for dual mode power in the electrified territory. In the examples cited in original post the owning agency does not operate whatever freight service is provided. It is some other operator. For the NEC east of New Haven there are G&W (P&W) and CSX.

Regarding the scenario of GE rebuilding the electrification and maybe owning the Milwaukee Road if it went bankrupt, not so. At the time of its last bankruptcy, the MILW had $103 million in first and general mortgage debt and another $55 million in debenture bonds, all superior to any other claim ag...

Re: Abandonded Stations on Existing Commuter Rail lines

 by edbear ¦  Sat Jun 13, 2020 3:35 pm ¦  Forum: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) ¦  Topic: Abandonded Stations on Existing Commuter Rail lines ¦  Replies: 40 ¦  Views: 9094

Eastern Route: Everett, East Everett, Forbes (Forbes Lithograph), Revere, West Lynn, East Lynn, United Shore Machinery Works
Gloucester Branch: West Manchester, Magnolia

Re: Abandonded Stations on Existing Commuter Rail lines

 by edbear ¦  Wed Jun 10, 2020 3:27 pm ¦  Forum: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) ¦  Topic: Abandonded Stations on Existing Commuter Rail lines ¦  Replies: 40 ¦  Views: 9094

Cordaville on the Worcester Line was about where the Fitzgerald Store is at Route 85. Southville was pretty close by, near where Parkerville Road ends.

Re: Another old timetable question

 by edbear ¦  Mon Jun 01, 2020 6:38 pm ¦  Forum: General Discussion - Passenger Rail: High Speed and Heavy and Light Rail Systems ¦  Topic: Another old timetable question ¦  Replies: 3 ¦  Views: 1338

Most L & N passenger trains probably had diesel power by the early 1950s. L & N bought its first E6 passenger diesels in 1942. While big steam lasted on freights until about 1956, passenger trains passenger service was entrusted to diesels, early.

  • 1
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 40