RC '75 wrote:I had a few questions regarding electric current on NJT.
Does anyone know what the voltage is for each line on NJT?
The NEC, it's tunnels, and NJCL north of South Amboy are all 11.5kv@25hz, the old Pennsy standard. The NJCL south of South Amboy down to Long Branch, as well as the entire Hoboken electrified division and the Midtown Direct connection west of the phase gap (ride the NEC, you'll see the signs and insulators) are all 25kv@60hz. The Hoboken electrified division used to be 3000 volts DC, but in 1984 was converted to 25kv with the expectation that Amtrak would follow suit.
RC '75 wrote:Is the voltage the same in NYP as it is at Sunnyside Yard?
Yes, the NEC from Washington DC to SHELL interlocking in New Rochelle is all 11.5kv@25hz. As noted above the New Haven used to be 11.5kv to the end of their system as well, but the MTA changed the system over to 12kv@60hz.
RC '75 wrote:Are all Arrow III's leaving NYP set for the same voltage, (if that is the correct term) or are they set to a specific line?
Yes, the Arrow's transformers can only be changed between 25kv and 11.5kv systems while in the shop. You can see stickers in the corners of the car stating "12kv" or "25kv" and indicating which system the car is set up for. It's likely that NJT didn't feel automatic tap changing was neccesary since at the time the M&E was completely separate from the NEC and it was expected that by the time MidTown Direct came to be the NEC would be 25kv anyway.
Oddly enough some of SEPTA's Silverliner IVs were delivered with automatic tap changing transformers, in addition to factory dynamic brakes. This was likely for the same reason NJT chose not to have Automatic Tap Changing in the Arrow IIIs. SEPTA was likely planning on Amtrak changing over the 25kv@60hz, but SEPTA likely would have retained some branches at 11.5kv@25hz rather than spend the money on upgrading the entire ex-Reading network. In the mid 1990s with the prospect of Amtrak changing standards on the NEC looking less and less likely and the environmental impact of PCBs lining up the transformers were swapped for non-tap changing units with more environmentally friendly units.
These days thanks to modern power electronics it doesn't even matter which power source the train uses. The only consideration would be the efficiency of transmission and the power delivered. 1.5kv is pretty piss-poor when it comes to delivering watts, while 50kv@60hz is superb, but has issues with clearance and leakage. Germany has the same low-frequency high voltage AC power that the Pennsy used, yet they have low floor LRVs that are capable of operating off a 750vdc trolley overhead or a 15kvAC@17hz with roof mounted high frequency transformers.
These days you wouldn't even have needed to reelectrify the M&E from 3kvdc to 25kvAC for Midtown direct. The French have had dual-voltage 1.5kv+25kv locomotives for years, and with the coming of the EU other countries have adopted increasingly versatile electric locomotives, some of which can travel on all the electrical systems on the continent. The quadrivoltage Class 189 locomotives and ICE 3M can run under 1.5kvDC, 3kvDC, 15kvAC@17hz, and 25kvAC@50hz. The Class 189 is not too far removed from the Class 185 which formed the basis for the ALP46. If the M&E had stayed 3kvDC and the ALP46 had been based on the Class 189 then the push pull's ontime rating likely would have suffered more compared to their operation under 25kv. The Class 189 develops 6400kw under both 15kv and 25kv, but only 6000kw under 3kv, and an abyssmal 4200kw under 1.5kvDc power. It wouldn't have been a great difference, but since people seem to lose it when a train loses 2 or 3 minutes on an unfavorable schedule.
For more on the class 189:
http://www.br146.de/revisionen_daten/
technische_Daten_BR_189.htm