by E-44
cruiser939 wrote:No misrepresentation claimed and no offense taken nor inferred, Cruiser. I would never jump on your case for making me state mine more succinctly.gardendance wrote:The part I left out (because it had nothing to do with the part I quoted) identified other parties and how they had led to the ultimate failure of other projects, not the North Brunswick Transit Village.E-44 wrote:Only agency not playing ball so far is NJT (at least not openly). Don't know if they've initiated talks with Amtrak yet about doing it. I hope North Brunswick is serious about making approval contingent upon actually getting permission and funding aid to build this station. Otherwise, it's just more car traffic on US1.cruiser939 wrote: Well I'm glad that you claim to recognize the hurdles involved, because your original post seemed to indicate that NJT is the party that is holding this up; which is not the case.Cruiser,
I don't think the post you partially quoted said NJT was the only party holding things up, but that it was the only agency. I think that the part you left out mentioned a couple of other parties, I think they were municipal governments, which can sometimes be different critters than appointed agencies.
If E-44 felt I was misquoting him, I hope he would have said so in his subsequent post.
Besides, if you've run the P40 with its "doesn't load like JT's beloved geeps, doesn't belch like an ALCO" engine management software, I would already have been sufficiently avenged.
"Sewaren, Sewaren. Next stop is Barber, then Perth Amboy."