Railroad Forums
Moderators: lensovet, Kaback9, nick11a
waldwickrailfan wrote:i saw 4913 on train 49 today. that also means train 66. so a newbie is not running again? GREAT WORK with the rebuilding
DutchRailnut wrote:Obviously CAT can build an engine, but their subsidiary can't rebuild a locomotive.waldwickrailfan wrote:i saw 4913 on train 49 today. that also means train 66. so a newbie is not running again? GREAT WORK with the rebuilding
shhhhhttt their rebuilt by Progress Rail, and their part of Caterpillar, the one who supplies the engines for HEP's and for ALP45DP so don't upset the apple cart, shhhhtttt.
The Machine wrote:Can anyone post what old numbers correspond to new numbers? Like for example, 4191 becomes 49??http://www.altoonaworks.info/rebuilds/d ... h-2cat.pdf
ns3010 wrote:It would appear that the contract option for 4193 and 4194 (4909 and 4910) has been exercised. 4910 was headed to Kentucky a week before Christmas (photo not mine):Juniata...HA! I wish.
http://rrpicturearchives.net/showPictur ... id=2847328
ns3010 wrote:It would appear that the contract option for 4193 and 4194 (4909 and 4910) has been exercised. 4910 was headed to Kentucky a week before Christmas (photo not mine):Great...
http://rrpicturearchives.net/showPictur ... id=2847328
ATCFault wrote:Dang. Now all I'll ever get is a F40 pretending to be a genesis (the new paintscheme)ns3010 wrote:It would appear that the contract option for 4193 and 4194 (4909 and 4910) has been exercised. 4910 was headed to Kentucky a week before Christmas (photo not mine):Great...
http://rrpicturearchives.net/showPictur ... id=2847328
Those were the only two mildly-good MTA units left.
DutchRailnut wrote:the Genesis never had this scheme originally so the statement makes no senceNew MNCR P32ACDM scheme, not Amtrak
DutchRailnut wrote:not just P32acdm but also BL20gh so whats the point, new corporate scheme, not just genesis.No one cares about the BL20, so people associate it with the Genesis. Not sure why it's such an issue.
