by CNJGeep
http://railwayage.com/index.php/passeng ... channel=55
Ch-ch-ch-ch-Changes
Ch-ch-ch-ch-Changes
"It's not even a railroad anymore, it's a circus act."
Railroad Forums
Moderators: lensovet, Kaback9, nick11a
CNJGeep wrote:http://railwayage.com/index.php/passeng ... channel=55Seems to be a reasonable compromise. Generally it has been my observation, especially at low level platforms, a regular bicycle does result in longer dwell times at stations during busier hours. Folding does not take longer.
Ch-ch-ch-ch-Changes
Jtgshu wrote:Good to see you Mr. Bowen! Hope all is well!Oooph! I'm already confused because I had the exact opposite interpretation JT. I read it and ASSUMED that any train destined for NYP between the listed hours wouldn't allow bike regardless of boarding or end point.
I did find the restriction on the weekends interesting. Maybe i read it wrong, but I think it might cause some confusion with the train crews at least if bikes are allowed on trains going to NY, but just not taking the bike itself INTO NY or not allowed on those trains at all. I would ASSUME they meant that you can't travel with bike on a train INTO or OUT of NY (and only NY) during those hours, but you could other stops.
Just the fact that there is "rush hour" of sorts on the weekends is a statement of how busy weekends are becoming, especially with baseball games and in particular events at Met Life Stadium, etc.
I still think there should be a push for a removal of some seats from cars and adding fold up seats and grab irons for larger areas for folks to store not only their bicycles but luggage and strollers, bags, etc.
In response to customer requests regarding bike access at train stations, Transportation Commissioner and NJ TRANSIT Board Chairman James Simpson and NJ TRANSIT Executive Director James Weinstein today announced the designation of selected “bike-friendly” trains on weekends and other improvements in support of the transportation needs of the cycling community.
“After gathering valuable input from members of the cycling community, we worked to make some common-sense changes that help make NJ TRANSIT one of the most bicycle-friendly systems in the region,” said Commissioner Simpson. “By implementing designated bike trains on weekends on most of our rail lines, in addition to the regular weekend trains, we are providing capacity for up to 7,200 bicycles on Saturdays and Sundays combined.”
Effective Saturday, August 11, all weekend trains on the Raritan Valley Line and Atlantic City Rail Line and on rail service to and from Hoboken Terminal will become “bike-friendly” trains, providing capacity for up to 12 bicycles per train. The current policy allows for bicycle access only on open rail cars, meaning if four cars of a six-car train are open to customers, that train can accommodate only eight bicycles. Under the newly revised Bike Aboard program, train crew members will be able to open unused rail cars on designated bike trains as needed to provide additional capacity for cyclists.
As part of the expanded Bike Aboard program, NJ TRANSIT will be offering 418 designated bike trains on weekends on the Raritan Valley, Main/Bergen, Pascack Valley, Gladstone, Montclair-Boonton and Atlantic City Rail lines. An additional 273 non-designated bike trains on weekends can accommodate up to two bicycles per car on the Northeast Corridor, North Jersey Coast and Midtown Direct lines.
mtuandrew wrote:LMAO Andrew, as an avid Battlefield 3 player I found your M1 Abrams baby tank analogy outright hysterical. Anyways I think instead of retiring the CIVs they should do the bike conversion on the back half of the car and leave the front for seating, maybe insert one per train in the back of the consist so they're not in the way, I would say do it to the CIIIs but they've been sitting around for so long that they would need a rebuild first before you even thought of putting them back in service.25Hz wrote:I love when families board with a big non-folding stroller and 10 huge shopping bags & just expect everything to fit and be fine. Now, on one hand this is irritating & can create tripping hazards or take up seat space etc. On the other hand the train is there to serve a purpose and if you purchase a ticket you've paid to utilize it. I guess the point is where's that line? Why not restrict anyone with over-sized carry on items t the discretion of the conductor? If you want to bring something that might not quite fit the penalty shouldn't be banned from boarding simply you get lower priority & have to wait for a less crowded train.It'd be faster to ride the bicycle than to carry it on SEPTA. Regarding your earlier advocation of a bike car, the thought of hauling an extra 60 ton car to carry 1000 pounds of bicycles and other mobility accessories (not wheelchairs) just makes me mad. That said, it's probably a good idea to get more Americans out of their cars, considering the way most of us prefer to travel. I'd be a lot more forgiving if use of such a car meant a small fee imposed on oversize bicycles and strollers, so it didn't come directly from the pocket of the commuter agency.
I know septa isn't njt and is in a different state, but bikes are allowed on all non-peak trains as far as i can remember. Also low platforms make up a large percent of the system, which also connects to busses which all have bike racks on the front. If SEPTA can do it and maintain some semblance of on time performance NJT should be able to do same, it's not like the equipment is that much different.
You did hit on one of my pet peeves though - oversize strollers. I understand wanting to protect your kid, I really do. I don't understand using a four-foot-wide, six-foot-long M1A1 baby tank with crawler tracks and climate control for little precious. A lightweight folding stroller or wearable child carrier would be far less of a hassle for everyone. Even those stupid backpack kid leashes are better than carting your six-year-old around in a stroller the size of Kansas!