by jwhite07
Sigh. Here we go again.
http://www.boston.com/news/local/massac ... nfeasible/
"We're committed to moving the project forward. The goal is to get it done''. -- Mike Mulhern, as quoted in the Boston Herald, November 8, 2001
So much for that commitment, huh?
It's interesting to note that the majority of the issues offered up as excuses for the supposed "nearly physically impossible" nature of streetcar operation here in Boston are directly based on illegal actions (violating Snow Emergency parking restrictions, double parking, parking in bus or streetcar stops, loading zone violations, etc). Heck, aside from all of the other laws being broken with such impunity, there's one law that exists solely to allow streetcars to operate without undue delay: "No driver shall stop, stand, or park a vehicle... upon any roadway in such a manner as to obstruct the movement of any streetcar, bus or railroad train."
The REAL problem here is that the City has no ability or desire to enforce the traffic laws in a comprehensive enough fashion that the free flow of traffic (of all modes) through that corridor will be restored to everyone's benefit. They're not going to support a project that requires them to put that much effort forth, even if it is to enforce laws that have been on the books for years. The MBTA, on the other hand, is currently star-struck with glitzy buses (and so short of capital funding because they're wasting it elsewhere), and they're desperate to wiggle out from underneath the commitment they are legally responsible for because that would mean the end of pet projects like Silver Line Phase III.
So what if John Q. Public loses out in the end... aren't we used to it by now?
http://www.boston.com/news/local/massac ... nfeasible/
"We're committed to moving the project forward. The goal is to get it done''. -- Mike Mulhern, as quoted in the Boston Herald, November 8, 2001
So much for that commitment, huh?
It's interesting to note that the majority of the issues offered up as excuses for the supposed "nearly physically impossible" nature of streetcar operation here in Boston are directly based on illegal actions (violating Snow Emergency parking restrictions, double parking, parking in bus or streetcar stops, loading zone violations, etc). Heck, aside from all of the other laws being broken with such impunity, there's one law that exists solely to allow streetcars to operate without undue delay: "No driver shall stop, stand, or park a vehicle... upon any roadway in such a manner as to obstruct the movement of any streetcar, bus or railroad train."
The REAL problem here is that the City has no ability or desire to enforce the traffic laws in a comprehensive enough fashion that the free flow of traffic (of all modes) through that corridor will be restored to everyone's benefit. They're not going to support a project that requires them to put that much effort forth, even if it is to enforce laws that have been on the books for years. The MBTA, on the other hand, is currently star-struck with glitzy buses (and so short of capital funding because they're wasting it elsewhere), and they're desperate to wiggle out from underneath the commitment they are legally responsible for because that would mean the end of pet projects like Silver Line Phase III.
So what if John Q. Public loses out in the end... aren't we used to it by now?