george matthews wrote:I do not think Morocco is the kind of country that needs a very fast rail system. (Actually, I would be surprised if in fact these trains run much faster than existing trains.) I do think the country needs sensible investment in projects that will benefit ordinary people. The money spent on this project will be diverted from more useful investments.
You don't think it needs a fast rail system, but obviously Morocco, France, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates do. There's always somebody who doesn't think a country needs high speed rail - look at the reactionaries in UK who oppose HS2.
The trains are scheduled to run at 320 km/h. Do you have some evidence for your surprise at this speed?
On benefiting ordinary people, let me quote again from the same article:
Fares for the train have not been announced, but they will likely be more expensive than the current train ticket, which costs about $20 one-way, while flights are around $200 round-trip. Still, officials say it won't set travelers back too much: "We will run trains intended for Moroccans and thus adapted to the purchasing power of Moroccans," ONCF's director general Mohamed Rabie Khlie told Le Monde. "We do not want a train reserved for high-end customers."
How do you know that the money spent on this will be diverted from "more useful investments"? Are you saying that you have evidence that all of this money would still be available for any other use, rather than being earmarked for high speed rail?
I'm sorry, but I find it really tedious the way people carp about Africa whenever it does try to embrace the modern world and develop itself. Better transport is an essential part of development in Africa.