by Mikejf
That will help the crews that have been pushed west.
Railroad Forums
Moderator: MEC407
newpylong wrote:WA-3 Sun-Thur 1400So,
WA-4 Tue-Sat 0300
MA-1 Mon-Fri 1900
MA-2 Sun-Thur 2200
pnolette wrote:If I read that right thats 2 trains each way a day?Likely not, one train each way each day. Crew change halfway. One crew will haul up/down to OT/NMJ, hotel and haul back the next day, meeting the opposing train/crew from their terminal on their run out. And running basically 5 days/week, but with staggered crew starts so trains will move 6 days but only 5 round trips...
gokeefe wrote:Interesting that they can't turn at least one set of containers fast enough to decrease the size of the equipment pool.Turns out a derailment blocking the tracks means that you can't send them through like normal.
gokeefe wrote:Why is this change happening?This topic has been beaten to death. See here -> viewtopic.php?f=55&t=68094&start=360" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; second post from the bottom, and read to the end of page 28. Or reread 93-95 of this thread. Myself and others have offered several opinions on the matter. Some discussion in the PAS thread too, if memory serves.
I'm assuming that Pan Am is unsatisfied with revenues on their haulage agreement with CMQ.
gokeefe wrote:I wondered if that was what was going on. Interesting that they can't turn at least one set of containers fast enough to decrease the size of the equipment pool.In this case some issues delayed the return. But right now I doubt they are too concerned with container equipment pool turn around to Maine. The pool of equipment in this service should be growing substantially in the coming weeks, so they aren't about to try and force a quick turn to cut 15 containers from the pool right now.