leviramsey wrote:BvaleShihTzu wrote:
But this isn't the issue here -- the double-tracking is funded by stimulus money, not state funds. The T dragging the work out, with now less than 100 meters of gap (around Andover station & Pearons St crossing) preventing the one stretch from being used -- and being that way for several years, simply shows a lack of urgency / disregard for improving service on the part of the T. Even if frequencies didn't go up, reliability would -- I've sat many times at Wilmington Junction waiting for a southbound Amtrak or MBTA train to pass, and sat long enough (at least once for :45) that it is clear if the double-track north of Ballardvale was in service the trains could pass there.
The MBTA has been slow on the particular project (which won't enable a reliable headway better than 40 minutes because of the fact the Orange Line exists) because of the Fitchburg Line rehab more or less taking up all the resources to get things done (because as bad as the Haverhill Line is, the Fitchburg is/was worse; you complain about a pair of 60-80 minute inbound service gaps in the morning? The Fitchburg line outside of Littleton has no inbounds for 200 minutes (over 3 hours!) between train 408 (leaves Fitchburg at 7:15) and train 414 (leaves Fitchburg at 10:35)*, and on top of that, the legislators in northern Worcester and northwestern Middlesex are gung-ho about it).
I've seen this rationalization before (or similar ones), but it doesn't hold up very well versus the alternative model of terrible project planning. If crews are so scarce, then why start the double-tracking below Ballardvale when the stretch above Ballardvale isn't complete? And why lay double-track that won't be used but will need to be removed as part of the Shawsheen River bridge rehabs, just so it can be replaced again? This looks much more like misusing scarce resources than shepherding them.
And as a commuter, to me :30 headways are really the need -- ask people who say they would consider the train but don't use it and the erratic frequencies are a significant issue. Many commuter rail lines run these frequencies or higher without being considered commuter rail -- SEPTA's Downingtown line or a host of LIRR or Metro-North lines.
SEPTA Downingtown? Do you mean Paoli/Thorndale
Downingtown AM peak inbound trains depart at: 5:02, 5:54, 6:18, 6:54, 7:22, 7:43, and 8:18 (so :30 headways for only a half-hour longer than the Haverhill Line). It's also not double-tracked, but triple-tracked.
I grew up near there but haven't been able to keep up with the name changes (Thorndale didn't have a station back in
my day
. My first instinct was to call it R5 or Paoli line. Triple-tracked, true, but surely not really needed to support just SEPTA frequencies.
With the proposed new schedule, :30ish headways on Haverhill line will be from ~5 to ~6:30 -- then almost an hour gap to the next train and another big jump after that. Those gaps are what make the train unusable for many people (I deal with it; many people I talk to don't).