by Long Island 7285
i beleive that the LIRR will tunnle under the East River and then go bleow the current GCT structure to an entirely seperate terminal not shareing ROW with MN. i guess it's to expensive to divise a interchangeable 3rd rail.
or ex build 3rd rails on both sides of the ROW, and raise and lower them depending on whos useing that ROW. it's and idea, and probly would save alot of time and headach on construction. perosnally i do think that in a world of technology we can definatly re invent the 3rd rail and get something to come of this, how ever they do it, lots of challenges are in the path of progress.
PS was this topic origionally started about MN going to NYP?
or ex build 3rd rails on both sides of the ROW, and raise and lower them depending on whos useing that ROW. it's and idea, and probly would save alot of time and headach on construction. perosnally i do think that in a world of technology we can definatly re invent the 3rd rail and get something to come of this, how ever they do it, lots of challenges are in the path of progress.
PS was this topic origionally started about MN going to NYP?