by ck4049
Those cabs are pretty well insulated, it wouldn't be too much louder than just one screamer alone.
Railroad Forums
Moderators: sery2831, CRail
beanbag wrote:They both aren't screaming because hep is only supplied from one loco. You can't hear much difference between 1 and 2.octr202 wrote:Doubleheader in service tonight...I think it was 1007 & 1002 paired up on track 10 about 5:30 Wednesday evening.Two screamers.. Hope that engineer had top notch hearing protection.
ck4049 wrote:Those cabs are pretty well insulated, it wouldn't be too much louder than just one screamer alone.Sure, with the air conditioning you can't hear much! REALLY? With the windows and both doors wide open there isn't much sound protection.
AEM7AC920 wrote:Good point.beanbag wrote:They both aren't screaming because hep is only supplied from one loco. You can't hear much difference between 1 and 2.octr202 wrote:Doubleheader in service tonight...I think it was 1007 & 1002 paired up on track 10 about 5:30 Wednesday evening.Two screamers.. Hope that engineer had top notch hearing protection.
octr202 wrote:I didn't have a clear view from inside 352...but it sure looked like double GP40's on 305 Friday morning...should become 310 inbound.1123(lead) and 1120.
Rbts Stn wrote:I guess just an engine isn't technically a consist, but PAR 601 just went barreling by here on her own, heading northwestwhere is here?
MBTA F40PH-2C 1050 wrote:Rbts Stn . Took me awhile to pick the screen name!Rbts Stn wrote:I guess just an engine isn't technically a consist, but PAR 601 just went barreling by here on her own, heading northwestwhere is here?
Rbts Stn wrote:I guess just an engine isn't technically a consist, but PAR 601 just went barreling by here on her own, heading northwestSounds like AY-4 returning to Ayer after dropping off the Rotems.