by gokeefe
Discussion on the OCS thread has once again reminded all of us of the fact that PAR continues to maintain the existence of at a minimum four separate major legacy corporations related to their acquisitions from 1981 onwards under Guilford Transportation Inc. (GTI). These are Boston & Maine Corporation (B&M), Maine Central Railroad Company (MEC), Springfield Terminal Railway (ST) Company and the Portland Terminal Company (PTM).
All of the four corporations (three in particular, MEC, B&M, and PTM) still are property owners of record for their respective legacy properties of which they have never been divested.
Over the years time and again in these forums discussion has taken place that indicated there were significant and substantial tax benefits to this arrangment. However, the exact benefits and statutory basis for these impressions have never been described. I would like to know once and for all what they are and as such I'm opening this thread for discussion.
While I think almost all of us understand quite well the lease arrangement (and the reasoning for it) for ST on the B&M/MEC and PTM I don't think the other aspects of the arrangement are all that clear at all.
Given the relative continued importance of these corporations to PAR and their respective geographical areas I would also like to expressely include any future changes to the status of these corporations as part of the scope of this thread.
All of the four corporations (three in particular, MEC, B&M, and PTM) still are property owners of record for their respective legacy properties of which they have never been divested.
Over the years time and again in these forums discussion has taken place that indicated there were significant and substantial tax benefits to this arrangment. However, the exact benefits and statutory basis for these impressions have never been described. I would like to know once and for all what they are and as such I'm opening this thread for discussion.
While I think almost all of us understand quite well the lease arrangement (and the reasoning for it) for ST on the B&M/MEC and PTM I don't think the other aspects of the arrangement are all that clear at all.
Given the relative continued importance of these corporations to PAR and their respective geographical areas I would also like to expressely include any future changes to the status of these corporations as part of the scope of this thread.
gokeefe